La théorie cartésienne de la substance: équivocité ou analogie?

Revue Internationale de Philosophie 50 (195):51-72 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Leibniz on Spinoza's Concept of Substance.Alan Hart - 1982 - Studia Leibnitiana 14:73-86.
La théorie cartésienne de l'énumération.R. Hubert - 1916 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 23 (3):489 - 516.
Sur l’analogie entre théorie et pratique chez Brentano.Denis Seron - 2008 - Bulletin d'Analyse Phénoménologique 4.
Note sur la théorie cartésienne de la direction du mouvement.Joseph Ohana - 1961 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 16 (3):313 - 316.
La révolution cartésienne et la notion spinoziste de la substance.Léon Brunschvicg - 1904 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 12 (5):755 - 798.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-21

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Substance and Independence in Descartes.Anat Schechtman - 2016 - Philosophical Review 125 (2):155-204.
The Disappearance Of Analogy in Descartes, Spinoza, and Regis.Tad M. Schmaltz - 2000 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 30 (1):85-113.
The Disappearance of Analogy in Descartes, Spinoza, and Régis.Tad M. Schmaltz - 2000 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 30 (1):85-113.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references