Conceivability and possibility: some dilemmas for Humeans

Synthese 195 (6):2697-2715 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Humean view that conceivability entails possibility can be criticized via input from cognitive psychology. A mainstream view here has it that there are two candidate codings for mental representations (one of them being, according to some, reducible to the other): the linguistic and the pictorial, the difference between the two consisting in the degree of arbitrariness of the representation relation. If the conceivability of P at issue for Humeans involves the having of a linguistic mental representation, then it is easy to show that we can conceive the impossible, for impossibilities can be represented by meaningful bits of language. If the conceivability of P amounts to the pictorial imaginability of a situation verifying P, then the question is whether the imagination at issue works purely qualitatively, that is, only by phenomenological resemblance with the imagined scenario. If so, the range of situations imaginable in this way is too limited to have a significant role in modal epistemology. If not, imagination will involve some arbitrary labeling component, which turns out to be sufficient for imagining the impossible. And if the relevant imagination is neither linguistic nor pictorial, Humeans will appear to resort to some representational magic, until they come up with a theory of a ‘third code’ for mental representations.

Similar books and articles

Conceivability, Imagination and Modal Knowledge.M. Oreste Fiocco - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (2):364–380.
Conceivability and Possibility.Tamar Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.) - 2002 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Introduction: Conceivability and possibility.Tamar Szabó Gendler & John Hawthorne - 2002 - In T. Szabó Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Conceivability and Possibility. Oxford University Press. pp. 1--70.
Conceivability and defeasible modal justification.Heimir Geirsson - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 122 (3):279-304.
Meta-conceivability.Philip Corkum - 2012 - Essays in Philosophy 13 (1):12.
Does conceivability entail possibility.David J. Chalmers - 2002 - In Tamar Szabo Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Conceivability and Possibility. Oxford University Press. pp. 145--200.
Imagination and Modal Epistemology.Peter Kung - 2002 - Dissertation, New York University
Imagery and imagination.Amy Kind - 2005 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Conceivability and modal knowledge.Rene Woudenberg - 2006 - Metaphilosophy 37 (2):210-221.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-25

Downloads
650 (#23,279)

6 months
146 (#18,483)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Franz Berto
University of St. Andrews
Tom Schoonen
University of Amsterdam

Citations of this work

Aboutness in Imagination.Franz Berto - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (8):1871-1886.
Impossible Worlds.Franz Berto & Mark Jago - 2013 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Knowing how things might have been.Mark Jago - 2018 - Synthese (Suppl 8):1-19.
Knowing how things might have been.Mark Jago - 2018 - Synthese 198 (S8):1981-1999.
Taming the runabout imagination ticket.Francesco Berto - 2018 - Synthese (Suppl 8):2029-2043.

View all 23 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Does conceivability entail possibility.David J. Chalmers - 2002 - In Tamar Szabo Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Conceivability and Possibility. Oxford University Press. pp. 145--200.
The Nature of Necessity.Alvin Plantinga - 1974 - Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.

View all 84 references / Add more references