Gupta's rule of revision theory of truth

Journal of Philosophical Logic 11 (1):103-116 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Gupta’s Rule of Revision theory of truth builds on insights to be found in Martin and Woodruff and Kripke in order to permanently deepen our understanding of truth, of paradox, and of how we work our language while our language is working us. His concept of a predicate deriving its meaning by way of a Rule of Revision ought to impact significantly on the philosophy of language. Still, fortunately, he has left me something to.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Comparing More Revision and Fixed-Point Theories of Truth.Qiqing Lin & Hu Liu - 2021 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 50 (4):615-671.
Trees for truth.Juan Barba - 2010 - Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 6 (1):71-99.
Trees for truth.Juan Barba - 2001 - Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 6 (1):71-99.
Comparing fixed-point and revision theories of truth.Philip Kremer - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (4):363-403.
Remarks on a Foundationalist Theory of Truth.Anil Gupta - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (3):721-727.
The paradox of belief instability and a revision theory of belief.Byeong D. Lee - 1998 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 79 (4):314-328.
Remarks on a Foundationalist Theory of Truth. [REVIEW]Anil Gupta - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (3):721–727.
The Liar and Theories of Truth.John Hawthorn - 1983 - Dissertation, Mcgill University (Canada)

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
133 (#137,445)

6 months
11 (#339,306)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nuel Belnap
University of Pittsburgh

Citations of this work

Conditionals in Theories of Truth.Anil Gupta & Shawn Standefer - 2017 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 46 (1):27-63.
The truth is never simple.John P. Burgess - 1986 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 51 (3):663-681.
How truthlike can a predicate be? A negative result.Vann McGee - 1985 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 14 (4):399 - 410.
Four valued semantics and the liar.Albert Visser - 1984 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 13 (2):181 - 212.
Instability and Contraction: Méditations hégéliennes I.Elia Zardini - 2019 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 48 (1):155-188.

View all 49 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Outline of a theory of truth.Saul Kripke - 1975 - Journal of Philosophy 72 (19):690-716.
A Prosentential theory of truth.Dorothy L. Grover, Joseph L. Camp & Nuel D. Belnap - 1975 - Philosophical Studies 27 (1):73--125.
On representing ‘true-in-L’ in L.Robert L. Martin - 1975 - Philosophia 5 (3):213-217.
Inheritors and paradox.Dorothy Grover - 1977 - Journal of Philosophy 74 (10):590-604.
Truth: Do We Need It?Dorothy Grover - 1981 - Philosophical Studies 40 (1):69-103.

View all 6 references / Add more references