Philosophy of Life: German Lebensphilosophie 1870-1920

Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This book is an account of the philosophical movement named Lebensphilosophie, which flourished at the end of the 19th and the beginning of the 20th century. There many philosophers who participated in the movement, but this book concentrates on the three most important: Friedrich Nietzsche, Wilhelm Dilthey and Georg Simmel. The movement was called Lebensphilosophie—literally, philosophy of life—because its main interest was not life as a biological phenomenon but life as it is lived by human beings. They regarded human life and experience as the fundamental reality, the basis of all knowledge and value, and disputed the relevance of any supernatural realm transcending human experience. The purpose of life was therefore life itself. Lebensphilosophie was the first modern philosophical movement in the Western tradition. It was “modern” in the sense that it was entirely humanist and secular, deriving all values from a non-religious perspective. Nietzsche, Dilthey and Simmel were either atheists or agnostics; they denied the relevance of any transcendent reality or being for human life. They abjured the traditional Christian concern with salvation and immortality. They also disputed the existence of natural law, teleology or a providential order; human beings created their own values and they did not conform to any made by nature. In anticipation of later existentialism, the Lebensphilosophen maintained that human beings are the makers of their own fate. Contrary to pessimism, they affirmed the great value of life while still acknowledging its frequent tragedy. The Lebensphilosophen were champions of an individualist ethics, which maintained that the highest good for a human being was self-realization, the development of a persons’s unique individuality. Their ethics was neither utilitarian nor de-ontological: it was not utilitarian because it did not regard the highest good as pleasure; self-realization could be a very unpleasant experience; and it was not de-ontological because it grounded moral norms upon the facts of human development and experience. The Lebensphilosophen were major advocates of historicism. They believed that human experience is formed by history, and that its horizons and limits are historical. Just as it was impossible to transcend human experience, so it was impossible to transcend history. All values and norms were therefore historical. In attempting to describe historical experience, the Lebensphilosophen developed the discipline of hermeneutics. They refused to accept mechanical explanation as a paradigm of explanation. This book attempts to describe and analyze the fundamental aspects of Lebensphilosophie by looking in detail at the views of its three leading figures. It examines their ethics, their religious background, their responses to pessimism and relativism, and their contributions to hermeneutics and historicism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,435

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dark Matters: Pessimism and the Problem of Suffering.Mara van der Lugt - 2021 - Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
What is political philosophy?: and other studies.Leo Strauss - 1959 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Reverence for Life.Predrag Cicovacki - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 10:61-67.
Essays on the history of moral philosophy.J. B. Schneewind - 2010 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The concept of the highest good in Kant's moral theory.Stephen Engstrom - 1992 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52 (4):747-780.
Pessimism, Political Critique, and the Contingently Bad Life.Patrick O'Donnell - 2022 - Journal of Philosophy of Life 12 (1):77-100.
Rüsen’s Legacy of Synthetic Historicism.Juan L. Fernández - forthcoming - Journal of the Philosophy of History:1-10.
Rüsen’s Legacy of Synthetic Historicism.Juan L. Fernández Vega - 2019 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 14 (1):118-127.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-04-28

Downloads
11 (#1,120,716)

6 months
3 (#987,746)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Frederick Beiser
Syracuse University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references