The Porosity of Autonomy: Social and Biological Constitution of the Patient in Biomedicine

American Journal of Bioethics 16 (2):34-45 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The nature and role of the patient in biomedicine comprise issues central to bioethical inquiry. Given its developmental history grounded firmly in a backlash against 20th-century cases of egregious human subjects abuse, contemporary medical bioethics has come to rely on a fundamental assumption: the unit of care is the autonomous self-directing patient. In this article we examine first the structure of the feminist social critique of autonomy. Then we show that a parallel argument can be made against relational autonomy as well, demonstrating how this second concept of autonomy fails to take sufficiently into account an array of biological determinants, particularly those from microbial biology. Finally, in light of this biological critique, we question whether or to what extent any relevant and meaningful view of autonomy can be recovered in the contemporary landscape of bioethics

Similar books and articles

Patient Autonomy and Social Fairness.Joshua Cohen - 2000 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 9 (3):391-399.
Autonomy, consent and the law.Sheila McLean - 2010 - New York, N.Y.: Routledge-Cavendish.
Shared decision-making and patient autonomy.Lars Sandman & Christian Munthe - 2009 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (4):289-310.
The Confucian bioethics of surrogate decision making: Its communitarian roots.Ruiping Fan - 2011 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 32 (5):301-313.
La idea de autonomía en biología.Arantza Etxeberria & Álvaro Moreno - 2007 - Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica [Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España] 40:21-37.
The individualist model of autonomy and the challenge of disability.Anita Ho - 2008 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 5 (2-3):193-207.
Autonomy and Long-Term Care.George J. Agich - 1993 - Oxford University Press.
Autonomy and Chronic Impairment.Carolyn Norine Ells - 2000 - Dissertation, The University of Tennessee
Choice and control in feminist bioethics.Susan Dodds - 2000 - In Catriona Mackenzie & Natalie Stoljar (eds.), Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self. New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-30

Downloads
1,158 (#10,704)

6 months
133 (#28,076)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Jonathan Beever
University of Central Florida
Nicolae Morar
University of Oregon

Citations of this work

Bioethics and the Hypothesis of Extended Health.Nicolae Morar & Joshua August Skorburg - 2018 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 28 (3):341-376.
Nudging and the Ecological and Social Roots of Human Agency.Nicolae Morar & Daniel Kelly - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (11):15-17.
The Myth of the Individual.Lorraine Code - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (2):59-60.
Toward an Ecological Bioethics.Nicolae Morar & Joshua August Skorburg - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (5):35-37.

View all 25 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Principles of biomedical ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1994 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by James F. Childress.
Group agency: the possibility, design, and status of corporate agents.Christian List & Philip Pettit - 2011 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Philip Pettit.
The ethics of care: personal, political, and global.Virginia Held - 2006 - New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 47 references / Add more references