The Kevorkian Challenge

Philosophy in the Contemporary World 2 (3):17-22 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The problem of self-determination in the dying process confronts a dilemma regarding clients’ desire to know and not to know. Ambivalence and guilt make “free choice” problematic in choosing the way to die. Telling dying clients the “whole truth” about their condition is an art or skill. The question of a meaningful death raises questions that philosophical analysis can help clarify.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,928

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the Subject(s) of Jack Kevorkian, M.D.: A Retrospective Analysis.Tom Koch - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (4):436-441.
Skepticism, Question Begging, and Burden Shifting.Paul K. Moser - 2000 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 5:209-217.
Beyond any kind of God.Jack Kevorkian - 1966 - New York,: Philosophical Library.
Free will and the unconscious precursors of choice.Markus E. Schlosser - 2012 - Philosophical Psychology 25 (3):365-384.
Commentary: Koch on Kevorkian: Who Knows Best?Steve Heilig - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (4):441-442.
Involuntary Clients, Pro-social Modelling and Ethics.Chris Trotter & Tony Ward - 2013 - Ethics and Social Welfare 7 (1):74-90.
The Art of Dying.Ward E. Jones - 2012 - Philosophical Papers 41 (3):435-454.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
25 (#633,530)

6 months
5 (#639,345)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references