Children and Marginalization: Reflections on Arlene Lo’s “Hermeneutical Injustice and Child Victims of Abuse”

Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (12):27-35 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I am in almost complete agreement with Arlene Lo (2022). Child abuse victims surely suffer hermeneutical injustice if they are denied the concepts necessary to understand their experience, and that injustice is immensely harmful. In this reply, I offer an amendment to Lo’s use of Sally Haslanger’s distinction between manifest and operative concepts. I then raise some wider questions about the hermeneutical marginalization of children. The work that has so far been done on epistemic injustice against children has focused mostly on testimonial injustice. It is time to give more attention to hermeneutical injustice.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hermeneutical Injustice and Child Victims of Abuse.Arlene Lo - 2023 - Social Epistemology 37 (3):364-377.
Rape Myths and Domestic Abuse Myths as Hermeneutical Injustices.Katharine Jenkins - 2017 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 34 (2):191-205.
Children, credibility, and testimonial injustice.Gary Bartlett - 2022 - Journal of Social Philosophy 53 (3):371-386.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-15

Downloads
238 (#84,574)

6 months
100 (#44,814)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gary Bartlett
Central Washington University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references