Belief–logic conflict resolution in syllogistic reasoning: Inspection-time evidence for a parallel-process model
Thinking and Reasoning 14 (2):168-181 (2008)
AbstractAn experiment is reported examining dual-process models of belief bias in syllogistic reasoning using a problem complexity manipulation and an inspection-time method to monitor processing latencies for premises and conclusions. Endorsement rates indicated increased belief bias on complex problems, a finding that runs counter to the “belief-first” selective scrutiny model, but which is consistent with other theories, including “reasoning-first” and “parallel-process” models. Inspection-time data revealed a number of effects that, again, arbitrated against the selective scrutiny model. The most striking inspection-time result was an interaction between logic and belief on premise-processing times, whereby belief - logic conflict problems promoted increased latencies relative to non-conflict problems. This finding challenges belief-first and reasoning-first models, but is directly predicted by parallel-process models, which assume that the outputs of simultaneous heuristic and analytic processing streams lead to an awareness of belief - logic conflicts than then require time-consuming resolution
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
Why Do Humans Reason? Arguments for an Argumentative Theory.Dan Sperber - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):57.
The Role of Answer Fluency and Perceptual Fluency as Metacognitive Cues for Initiating Analytic Thinking.Valerie A. Thompson, Jamie A. Prowse Turner, Gordon Pennycook, Linden J. Ball, Hannah Brack, Yael Ophir & Rakefet Ackerman - 2013 - Cognition 128 (2):237-251.
Conflict Detection, Dual Processes, and Logical Intuitions: Some Clarifications.Wim De Neys - 2014 - Thinking and Reasoning 20 (2):169-187.
The Time Course of Conflict on the Cognitive Reflection Test.Eoin Travers, Jonathan J. Rolison & Aidan Feeney - 2016 - Cognition 150:109-118.
The 'Whys' and 'Whens' of Individual Differences in Thinking Biases.Wim De Neys & Jean-François Bonnefon - 2013 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17 (4):172-178.
Similar books and articles
Argument and Belief: Where We Stand in the Keynesian Tradition. [REVIEW]R. P. Loui - 1991 - Minds and Machines 1 (4):357-365.
On the Resolution of Conflict in Dual Process Theories of Reasoning.Jonathan St B. T. Evans - 2007 - Thinking and Reasoning 13 (4):321 – 339.
Rapid Responding Increases Belief Bias: Evidence for the Dual-Process Theory of Reasoning.Jonathan St B. T. Evans & Jodie Curtis-Holmes - 2005 - Thinking and Reasoning 11 (4):382 – 389.
Evidence for Mental-Model-Based Reasoning: A Comparison of Reasoning with Time and Space Concepts.Andre Vandierendonck - 1996 - Thinking and Reasoning 2 (4):249 – 272.
Effects of Training and Instruction on Analytic and Belief-Based Reasoning Processes.Helen L. Neilens, Simon J. Handley & Stephen E. Newstead - 2009 - Thinking and Reasoning 15 (1):37 – 68.
Effects of Training and Instruction on Analytic and Belief-Based Reasoning Processes.Stephen E. Newstead, Simon J. Handley & Helen L. Neilens - 2009 - Thinking and Reasoning 15 (1):37-68.
Individual Differences and the Belief Bias Effect: Mental Models, Logical Necessity, and Abstract Reasoning.Donna Torrens - 1999 - Thinking and Reasoning 5 (1):1 – 28.