Hypatia 26 (4):715-741 (2011)
AbstractMy project here is to argue for situating moral judgments about Indian surrogacy in the context of Reproductive Justice. I begin by crafting the best picture of Indian surrogacy available to me while marking some worries I have about discursive colonialism and epistemic honesty. Western feminists' responses to contract pregnancy fall loosely into two interrelated moments: post-Baby M discussions that focus on the morality of surrogacy work in Western contexts, and feminist biomedical ethnographies that focus on the lived dimensions of reproductive technologies and how they are embodied and negotiated in specific cultural contexts. Both approaches have their shortcomings. Uncritically extending Western moral frameworks (for example, liberal feminist political values) to Indian surrogacy work raises the specter of discursive colonialism; with it, worries arise about how Western normative traditions can distort, erase, or misread non-Western subjects' lived experiences. Feminist biomedical ethnographic approaches correct this, but raise the specter of a weak moral absenteeism; with it, concerns arise about under-theorizing the structural harms and injustices shaping surrogacy worker's lives. I suggest that we might reduce these shortcomings by framing normative and ethnographic engagement with global surrogacy as questions of reproductive justice
Similar books and articles
Care Ethics and the Global Practice of Commercial Surrogacy.Jennifer A. Parks - 2010 - Bioethics 24 (7):333-340.
Reorienting the Ethics of Transnational Surrogacy as a Feminist Pragmatist.Amrita Banerjee - 2010 - The Pluralist 5 (3):107-127.
An Examination of Exploitation in International Gestational Surrogacy Contracts.Kathryn MacKay - unknown
The Exploitation Argument Against Commercial Surrogacy.Stephen Wilkinson - 2003 - Bioethics 17 (2):169–187.
Surrogacy in Australia: New Legal Developments.Renate Klein - 2011 - Bioethics Research Notes 23 (2):23.
Surrogacy and the Construction of the Maternal-Foetal Relationship: The Feminist Dilemma Examined.Vanessa E. Munro - 2001 - Res Publica 7 (1):13-37.
Enhancing Autonomy in Paid Surrogacy.Jennifer Damelio & Kelly Sorensen - 2008 - Bioethics 22 (5):269–277.
How to Address the Ethics of Reproductive Travel to Developing Countries: A Comparison of National Self-Sufficiency and Regulated Market Approaches.G. K. D. Crozier & Dominique Martin - 2012 - Developing World Bioethics 12 (1):45-54.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Transnational Gestational Surrogacy: Does It Have to Be Exploitative?Jeffrey Kirby - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (5):24-32.
Global Surrogacy: Exploitation to Empowerment.Vida Panitch - 2013 - Journal of Global Ethics 9 (3):329-343.
Exploitation in International Paid Surrogacy Arrangements.Stephen Wilkinson - 2016 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 33 (2):125-145.
Race and a Transnational Reproductive Caste System: Indian Transnational Surrogacy.Amrita Banerjee - 2014 - Hypatia 29 (1):113-128.
Reasoning From the Uterus: Casanova, Women's Agency, and the Philosophy of Birth.Stella Villarmea - 2021 - Hypatia 36 (1):22-41.
References found in this work
Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking From Women's Lives.Sandra Harding - 1991 - Cornell University.
Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses.Chandra Mohanty - 1988 - Feminist Review 30 (1):61-88.
Book Review:Feminist Politics and and Human Nature. Alison M. Jaggar. [REVIEW]Susan Moller Okin - 1985 - Ethics 95 (2):354-.
Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking From Women's Lives.Susan Babbitt & Sandra Harding - 1993 - Philosophical Review 102 (2):287.
Birthing a Mother: The Surrogate Body and the Pregnant Self.[author unknown] - 2010