- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Inappropriate judgements: Slips, mistakes or violations?
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):12-12 (1994)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Some mistakes about consciousness and their motivation.S. L. Hurley - 1992 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15 (2):211-212.
Will human-like machines make human-like mistakes?Evan J. Livesey, Micah B. Goldwater & Ben Colagiuri - 2017 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40.
Reliability, fairness, objectivity and other inappropriate goals in peer review.John C. Bailar - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):137-138.
What Peter thinks when he hears Mary speak.Ruth Garrett Millikan - 1987 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10 (4):725.
Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?-Open Peer Commentary-A psychological point of view: Violations of rational rules as a diagnostic of mental processes.K. E. Stanovich, R. F. West & D. Kalmeman - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):681-682.
Trying slips: Can Davidson and Hornsby account for mistakes and slips?Kay Peabody - 2005 - Philosophia 33 (1-4):173-216.
The coordinated structure of mosaic brain evolution.Robert A. Barton - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (2):281-282.
Objectivism should not be a casualty of innovation's operationalization.Rachel L. Kendal, Lewis Dean & Kevin N. Laland - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (4):413-414.
That old familiar feeling: On uniquely identifying the role of perirhinal cortex.M. J. Eacott - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):448-449.
Purity is not a distinct moral domain.Dolichan Kollareth & James A. Russell - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e308.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-20
Downloads
32 (#487,392)
6 months
7 (#592,600)
2014-01-20
Downloads
32 (#487,392)
6 months
7 (#592,600)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The evolutionary point of view: Rationality is elsewhere.Michel Cabanac - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):322-322.
Consequences of basing ethical judgments on heuristics.R. O. Lindsay & Barbara Gorayska - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):322-323.
Situated cognition, prescriptive theory, evolution, and something.Jonathan Baron - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):324-326.
Decentered thought and consequentialist decision making.Keith E. Stanovich - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):323-324.
On the description of the prescription.Ruth Beyth-Marom - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):321-321.
References found in this work
Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic & Amos Tversky (eds.) - 1982 - Cambridge University Press.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-kkm7k uwo