The homunculus brain and categorical logic

Philosophical Problems in Science 69:253-280 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The interaction between syntax and its semantics is one which has been well studied in categorical logic. The results of this particular study are employed to understand how the brain is able to create meanings. To emphasize the toy character of the proposed model, we prefer to speak of the homunculus brain rather than the brain per se. The homunculus brain consists of neurons, each of which is modeled by a category, and axons between neurons, which are modeled by functors between the corresponding neuron-categories. Each neuron has its own program enabling its working, i.e. a theory of this neuron. In analogy to what is known from categorical logic, we postulate the existence of a pair of adjoint functors, called Lang and Syn, from a category, now called BRAIN, of categories, to a category, now called MIND, of theories. Our homunculus is a kind of “mathematical robot”, the neuronal architecture of which is not important. Its only aim is to provide us with the opportunity to study how such a simple brain-like structure could “create meanings” and perform abstraction operations out of its purely syntactic program. The pair of adjoint functors Lang and Syn model the mutual dependencies between the syntactical structure of a given theory of MIND and the internal logic of its semantics given by a category of BRAIN. In this way, a formal language and its meanings are interwoven with each other in a manner corresponding to the adjointness of the functors Lang and Syn. Higher cognitive functions of abstraction and realization of concepts are also modelled by a corresponding pair of adjoint functors. The categories BRAIN and MIND interact with each other with their entire structures and, at the same time, these very structures are shaped by this interaction.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Syntax-Semantics Interaction in Mathematics.Michael Heller - 2018 - Studia Semiotyczne 32 (2):87-105.
On Adjoint and Brain Functors.David Ellerman - 2016 - Axiomathes 26 (1):41-61.
Mind and Brain: A Contribution from Microgenetic Theory.Jason Brown - 2014 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 21 (1-2):54-73.
Category-theoretic analysis of the notion of complementarity for quantum systems.Elias Zafiris - 2006 - International Journal of General Systems 35 (1):69-89.
Quantum Metaphors and the Study of the Mind-Brain.Delores D. Liston - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 29:228-234.
Mind architecture and brain architecture.Camilo J. Cela-Conde & Gisèle Marty - 1997 - Biology and Philosophy 12 (3):327-340.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-31

Downloads
22 (#692,982)

6 months
5 (#638,139)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Steve Awodey
Carnegie Mellon University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity.Warren S. McCulloch & Walter Pitts - 1943 - The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 5 (4):115-133.
Scientific Theories.Hans Halvorson - 2016 - In Paul Humphreys (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Science. Oxford University Press USA. pp. 585-608.
Tarski's truth definitions.Wilfrid Hodges - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 9 references / Add more references