Categories of scientific theories

In Elaine M. Landry (ed.), Categories for the Working Philosopher. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We discuss ways in which category theory might be useful in philosophy of science, in particular for articulating the structure of scientific theories. We argue, moreover, that a categorical approach transcends the syntax-semantics dichotomy in 20th century analytic philosophy of science.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,667

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Syntax-Semantics Interaction in Mathematics.Michael Heller - 2018 - Studia Semiotyczne 32 (2):87-105.
What Was the Syntax‐Semantics Debate in the Philosophy of Science About?Sebastian Lutz - 2017 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 95 (2):319-352.
Computational empiricism.Paul Humphreys - 1995 - Foundations of Science 1 (1):119-130.
Scientific Theories.Hans Halvorson - 2014 - In Paul Humphreys (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Science. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press. pp. 585-608.
The homunculus brain and categorical logic.Steve Awodey & Michał Heller - 2020 - Philosophical Problems in Science 69:253-280.
Anti-Scepticism and Epistemic Humility in Pierre Duhem’s Philosophy of Science.Gueguen Marie & Psillos Stathis - 2017 - Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science 2:54.
The logical foundations of scientific theories. Languages, Structures, and Models.Decio Krause & Jonas R. B. Arenhart - 2016 - Nova Iorque, NY, EUA: Routledge. Edited by Becker Arenhart & R. Jonas.
Categories and the Foundations of Classical Field Theories.James Owen Weatherall - 2017 - In Elaine M. Landry (ed.), Categories for the Working Philosopher. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Category theory: The language of mathematics.Elaine Landry - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (3):27.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-07

Downloads
256 (#104,651)

6 months
28 (#120,992)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hans Halvorson
Princeton University

Citations of this work

On Dualities and Equivalences Between Physical Theories.Jeremy Butterfield - 2021 - In Christian Wüthrich, Baptiste Le Bihan & Nick Huggett (eds.), Philosophy Beyond Spacetime: Implications From Quantum Gravity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Categories and the Foundations of Classical Field Theories.James Owen Weatherall - 2017 - In Elaine M. Landry (ed.), Categories for the Working Philosopher. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Definable categorical equivalence.Laurenz Hudetz - 2019 - Philosophy of Science 86 (1):47-75.
Why surplus structure is not superfluous.Nguyen James, J. Teh Nicholas & Wells Laura - 2018 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 71 (2):665-695.
Part 2: Theoretical equivalence in physics.James Owen Weatherall - 2019 - Philosophy Compass 14 (5):e12591.

View all 21 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Scientific Image.William Demopoulos & Bas C. van Fraassen - 1982 - Philosophical Review 91 (4):603.
The Structure of Science.Ernest Nagel - 1961 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 17 (2):275-275.
The philosophy of symbolic forms.Ernst Cassirer - 1953 - New Haven,: Yale University Press.
What Scientific Theories Could Not Be.Hans Halvorson - 2012 - Philosophy of Science 79 (2):183-206.

View all 20 references / Add more references