Are There A Priori Concepts?1

In John Langshaw Austin (ed.), Philosophical Papers. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press (1961)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Austin discusses the existence, origin, and resemblance of concepts, primarily by discussing the meaning of ‘concept’ and ‘universal’. He argues that, although sometimes it may not be harmful to talk about concepts, we neither understand the meaning of ‘concept’, nor the meaning of ‘acquiring and possessing concepts’, nor a view of concept resemblance as non-sensuous acquaintance or awareness, challenging philosophers who couch their theories in such terms to illuminating them first.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Philosophical Papers.J. O. Urmson & G. J. Warnock (eds.) - 1961 - Clarendon Press.
Philosophical papers.John Langshaw Austin - 1962 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by J. O. Urmson & G. J. Warnock.
Concepts: neither Representations nor Abilities but Rules.Federico Castellano - 2018 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 22 (2):277-300.
Fodor on concepts: Philosophical aspects.Christopher Peacocke - 2000 - Mind and Language 15 (2-3):327-340.
G. J. Warnock, "J. L. Austin".David Holdcroft - 1990 - Philosophical Quarterly 40 (161):522.
Austin's ‘Philosophical Papers’.Alice Ambrose - 1963 - Philosophy 38 (145):201.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-25

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

An Archimedean Point for Philosophy.Shyam Ranganathan - 2011 - Metaphilosophy 42 (4):479-519.
L'usage des sens.Christophe Alsaleh - 2004 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 2 (2):193-215.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references