How Reliably Do Eye Parameters Indicate Internal Versus External Attentional Focus?

Cognitive Science 45 (4):e12977 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Eye behavior is increasingly used as an indicator of internal versus external focus of attention both in research and application. However, available findings are partly inconsistent, which might be attributed to the different nature of the employed types of internal and external cognition tasks. The present study, therefore, investigated how consistently different eye parameters respond to internal versus external attentional focus across three task modalities: numerical, verbal, and visuo‐spatial. Three eye parameters robustly differentiated between internal and external attentional focus across all tasks. Blinks, pupil diameter variance, and fixation disparity variance were consistently increased during internally directed attention. We also observed substantial attentional focus effects on other parameters (pupil diameter, fixation disparity, saccades, and microsaccades), but they were moderated by task type. Single‐trial analysis of our data using machine learning techniques further confirmed our results: Classifying the focus of attention by means of eye tracking works well across participants, but generalizing across tasks proves to be challenging. Based on the effects of task type on eye parameters, we discuss what eye parameters are best suited as indicators of internal versus external attentional focus in different settings.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,435

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How unitary is the capacity-limited attentional focus?Torsten Schubert & Peter A. Frensch - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):146-147.
Internal History versus External History.Bence Nanay - 2017 - Philosophy 92 (2):207-230.
The internal and external components of cognition.Ralph Wedgwood - 2006 - In Robert J. Stainton (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Cognitive Science. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 307-325.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-04-21

Downloads
8 (#1,299,968)

6 months
4 (#790,778)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?