Hypatia 19 (1):1-24 (2004)

Authors
Elizabeth Anderson
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Abstract
: The underdetermination argument establishes that scientists may use political values to guide inquiry, without providing criteria for distinguishing legitimate from illegitimate guidance. This paper supplies such criteria. Analysis of the confused arguments against value-laden science reveals the fundamental criterion of illegitimate guidance: when value judgments operate to drive inquiry to a predetermined conclusion. A case study of feminist research on divorce reveals numerous legitimate ways that values can guide science without violating this standard
Keywords Feminism   Ethics   Underdetermination   Philosophy of Science
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2979/HYP.2004.19.1.1
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,436
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Structure of Science.Ernest Nagel - 1961 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 17 (2):275-275.

View all 32 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Illegitimate Values, Confirmation Bias, and Mandevillian Cognition in Science.Uwe Peters - 2021 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 72 (4):1061-1081.
A New Direction for Science and Values.Daniel J. Hicks - 2014 - Synthese 191 (14):3271-95.
Distinguishing Between Legitimate and Illegitimate Values in Climate Modeling.Kristen Intemann - 2015 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 5 (2):217-232.

View all 125 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
600 ( #14,118 of 2,519,857 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #48,353 of 2,519,857 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes