Subjunctive Tu quoque Arguments. Commentary on Anderson, Aikin & Casey

Argumentation. Cognition and Community. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA) (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Tu quoque arguments regard inconsistencies in some speaker‘s performance. Most tu quoque arguments depend on actual inconsistencies. However, there are forms of tu quoque arguments that key, instead, on the conflicts a speaker would have, were some crucial contingent fact different. These, we call subjunctive tu quoque arguments. Finally, there are cases wherein the counterfactual inconsistencies of a speaker are relevant to the issue.

Similar books and articles

Tu quoque, Archbishop.Brendan Larvor - 2004 - Think 3 (7):101-108.
Tu Quoque.Roger Teichmann - 1987 - Analysis 47 (4):199 - 201.
Et Tue Quoque?: Rationalism Reconsidered.Paul Sagal - 1991 - Reason Papers 16:209-223.
Individualism and Self-Knowledge: Tu Quoque.Kelly Becker - 2002 - American Philosophical Quarterly 39 (3):289 - 295.
Rationality and the tu quoque argument.Joseph Agassi - 1973 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 16 (1-4):395 – 406.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-02

Downloads
360 (#55,579)

6 months
66 (#73,035)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christoph Lumer
University Of Siena

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations