Tu quoque, Archbishop

Think 3 (7):101-108 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Brendan Larvor finds that the Archbishop of Canterbury's recent arguments about religious education are a curate's egg.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s1477175600000907

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Sally N. Vaughn, Archbishop Anselm : Bec Missionary, Canterbury Primate, Patriarch of Another World. Farnham, UK, and Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2012. Pp. xxii, 287; 4 black-and-white figures. $39.95. ISBN: 9781409401223. [REVIEW]Judith Green - 2014 - Speculum 89 (1):259-261.
Archbishop John O'Reily: First Bishop of Port Augusta and Second Archbishop of Adelaide - Some Aspects of His Theology and Practice.Robert Rice - 2007 - The Australasian Catholic Record 84 (2):169.
Tu Quoque Arguments and the Significance of Hypocrisy.Scott F. Aikin - 2008 - Informal Logic 28 (2):155-169.
Ryle on Namely-Riders.P. T. Geach - 1960 - Analysis 21 (3):64-67.
John Pecham, O.F.M. & Archbishop of Canterbury.Girard Etzkorn - 2008 - Modern Schoolman 86 (1-2):147-160.
Saint Anselm and his Biographer. [REVIEW]J. D. Bastable - 1964 - Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 13:294-296.
The testament or last will of Archbishop Walter Reynolds of Canterbury, 1327.J. Robert Wright - 1985 - Mediaeval Studies 47 (1):445-473.
Archbishop Hallinan.John Tracy Ellis - 1968 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 43 (4):539-572.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-23

Downloads
284 (#68,827)

6 months
37 (#96,256)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Brendan Larvor
University of Hertfordshire

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references