Studies in Philosophy and Education 28 (6):499-515 (2009)

The article distinguishes between the various arguments traditionally offered as justifications for the principle of academic freedom. Four main arguments are identified, three consequentialist in nature, and one nonconsequentialist. The article also concentrates on the specific form these arguments must take in order to establish academic freedom as a principle distinct from the more general principles of freedom of expression and intellectual freedom.
Keywords Academic freedom  University functions  Marketplace of ideas  Professional autonomy
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11217-009-9142-6
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,259
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Morality of Freedom.Joseph Raz - 1986 - Oxford University Press.
The morality of freedom.J. Raz - 1988 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 178 (1):108-109.
Democratic Education.Alison M. Jaggar - 1990 - Philosophical Review 99 (3):468-472.
Consequentialism.Philip Pettit - 1991 - Dartmouth Publishing Company.

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
42 ( #271,853 of 2,518,715 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,070 of 2,518,715 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes