- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
"Deterrence,"
In Prisoners of Reason: Game Theory and Neoliberal Political Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 99-140 (2015)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Die Mängel der Abschreckung: Lassen sie sich beheben?Daniel Frei - 1987 - Analyse & Kritik 9 (1-2):97-119.
The Limits of Deterrence Theory in Cyberspace.Mariarosaria Taddeo - 2018 - Philosophy and Technology 31 (3):339-355.
Taking Deterrence Seriously: The Wide-Scope Deterrence Theory of Punishment.Lee Hsin-wen - 2017 - Criminal Justice Ethics 36 (1):2-24.
Deterrence in Cyberspace: a Silver Bullet or a Sacred Cow?Ewan Lawson - 2018 - Philosophy and Technology 31 (3):431-436.
In Search of Lost Deterrence – Two essays on deterrence and the models employed to study the phenomenon.Karl Sörenson - unknown
An Examination of a Moral Argument against Nuclear Deterrence.Robert McKim - 1985 - Journal of Religious Ethics 13 (2):279 - 297.
Is Nuclear Deterrence Paradoxical?:Nuclear Deterrence, Morality, and Realism. John Finnis, Joseph M. Boyle, Jr., Germain Grisez; Moral Paradoxes of Nuclear Deterrence. Gregory Kavka. [REVIEW]Jeff McMahan - 1989 - Ethics 99 (2):407-.
Warfighting for Cyber Deterrence: a Strategic and Moral Imperative.David J. Lonsdale - 2018 - Philosophy and Technology 31 (3):409-429.
Nuclear Deterrence and the Morality of Intentions.Kenneth W. Kemp - 1987 - The Monist 70 (3):276-297.
Theological method in the deterrence debate.G. R. Dunstan - 1982 - In Geoffrey L. Goodwin (ed.), Ethics and Nuclear Deterrence. St. Martin's Press.
Escaping from the Bomb: Immoral Deterrence and the Problem of Extrication.C. A. J. Coady - 1989 - In Henry Shue (ed.), Nuclear Deterrence and Moral Restraint. Cambridge University Press. pp. 163--226.
Analytics
Added to PP
2022-03-13
Downloads
142 (#131,234)
6 months
74 (#64,711)
2022-03-13
Downloads
142 (#131,234)
6 months
74 (#64,711)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
On (im)permeabilities: Social and human sciences on both sides of the ‘Iron Curtain’.Ivan Boldyrev & Olessia Kirtchik - 2016 - History of the Human Sciences 29 (4-5):3-12.
Game theory, cheap talk and post‐truth politics: David Lewis vs. John Searle on reasons for truth‐telling.S. M. Amadae - 2018 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 48 (3):306-329.
Dictatorship, transition, and the forging of political science in Uruguay.Paulo Ravecca - 2020 - Science in Context 33 (2):171-193.
Power, politics, and the development of political science in the Americas.Thibaud Boncourt & Paulo Ravecca - 2020 - Science in Context 33 (2):95-100.
References found in this work
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk.D. Kahneman & A. Tversky - 1979 - Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society:263--291.
Deterrence, utility, and rational choice.Gregory S. Kavka - 1980 - Theory and Decision 12 (1):41-60.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-wg6s5 uwo