False starts, dead ends, and new opportunities in public opinion research

Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 18 (1-3):75-104 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Empirical research on public opinion has tended to misjudge the normative rationales for modern democracy. Although it is often presumed that citizens' policy preferences are the opinions of interest to democratic theorists, and that democracy requires a highly informed citizenry, neither of these premises represents a dominant position in mainstream democratic theory. Besides incorrect assumptions about major tenets of democratic theory, empirical research on civic engagement is running into dead ends that will require normative analysis to overcome. Bringing political philosophy back in to the study of public opinion can not only remedy shortcomings in the empirical literature, but can also underscore how relevant that literature is for a wide range of problems in democratic practice

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Beyond polling alone: The quest for an informed public.James S. Fishkin - 2006 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 18 (1-3):157-165.
Democratic politics and survey research.Lynn M. Sanders - 1999 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 29 (2):248-280.
Setting up a new model of the democratic theory ‐ research on Habermas’ theory of public sphere.Cui Zhang - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:1095-1103.
Politesse and Public Opinion in Stendhal’s Red and Black.Richard Boyd - 2005 - European Journal of Political Theory 4 (4):367-392.
Means, ends, and public ignorance in Habermas's theory of democracy.Matthew Weinshall - 2003 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 15 (1-2):23-58.
What is public opinion?Eric R. A. N. Smith - 1996 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 10 (1):95-105.
Does Public Ignorance Matter?Robert S. Erikson - 2007 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 19 (1):23-34.
Should the Mass Public Follow Elite Opinion? It Depends ….Jennifer L. Hochschild - 2012 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 24 (4):527-543.
Is Public Opinion an Illusion?Benjamin I. Page - 2007 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 19 (1):35-45.
On the Public.Alastair Hannay - 2005 - Routledge.
What wrongdoers deserve: the moral reasoning behind responses to misconduct.R. Murray Thomas - 1993 - Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press. Edited by Ann Diver-Stamnes.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-23

Downloads
37 (#432,516)

6 months
10 (#272,213)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

What's Wrong with Partisan Deference?Elise Woodard - forthcoming - In Worsnip Alex (ed.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology, Vol. 8. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ignorance as a starting point: From modest epistemology to realistic political theory.Jeffrey Friedman - 2007 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 19 (1):1-22.
Ignorance as a Starting Point: From Modest Epistemology to Realistic Political Theory.Jeffrey Friedman - 2007 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 19 (1):1-22.
References.Jaegwon Kim - 2006 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 18 (1-3):331-360.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references