Does Public Ignorance Matter?

Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 19 (1):23-34 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACT Recent scholarship has attempted to restore the reputation of the American electorate, even though its level of political interest and information has not measurably increased. Scott Althaus’s Collective Preferences in Democratic Politics challenges this revisionist optimism, arguing that opinion polls misrepresent the interests of a large segment of society, and that they therefore get too much attention as a guide to policy makers, because those being polled are so ill informed. But Althaus overestimates the degree to which respondent ignorance is responsible for the instability of survey responses; and he is perhaps too critical of polling as the vehicle for transmitting voter interests. His analysis of information effects on political attitudes, however, raises the important question of how public opinion would be different if it were well informed. The answer is, I believe: only minimally different.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Beyond polling alone: The quest for an informed public.James S. Fishkin - 2006 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 18 (1-3):157-165.
Do politicians pander?Ilya Somin - 2000 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 14 (2-3):147-155.
The “public” and “its” ignorance: Reply to Wisniewski and fenster.Bret Chandler - 2010 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 22 (1):85-96.
Knowledge about ignorance: New directions in the study of political information.Ilya Somin - 2006 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 18 (1-3):255-278.
Ignorant democracy.Russell Hardin - 2006 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 18 (1-3):179-195.
Means, ends, and public ignorance in Habermas's theory of democracy.Matthew Weinshall - 2003 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 15 (1-2):23-58.
The Autonomy of the Democratic State: Rejoinder to Carpenter, Ginsberg, and Shefter.Samuel DeCanio - 2007 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 19 (1):187-196.
Habermas vs. Weber on democracy.Reihan Salam - 2001 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 15 (1-2):59-85.
Does public ignorance defeat deliberative democracy? [REVIEW]Robert B. Talisse - 2004 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 16 (4):455-463.
False starts, dead ends, and new opportunities in public opinion research.Scott L. Althaus - 2006 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 18 (1-3):75-104.
Is Public Opinion an Illusion?Benjamin I. Page - 2007 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 19 (1):35-45.
In Defense of Policy Polling: Rejoinder to Bishop.Benjamin I. Page - 2008 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 20 (1-2):159-165.
Democracy despite voter ignorance: A Weberian reply to Somin and Friedman.David Ciepley - 1999 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 13 (1-2):191-227.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-23

Downloads
38 (#365,484)

6 months
2 (#668,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Emotions and Memory.Fabrice Teroni - 2021 - The Emotion Researcher 2021.
Value Representation—the Dominance of Ends Over Means in Democratic Politics: Reply to Murakami.Morgan Marietta - 2010 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 22 (2):311-329.
Value representation—the dominance of ends over means in democratic politics: Reply to Murakami.Morgan Marietta - 2010 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 22 (2-3):311-329.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The nature of belief systems in mass publics (1964).Philip E. Converse - 2006 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 18 (1-3):1-74.

Add more references