It’s Just A Feeling: Why Economic Models Do Not Explain

Journal of Economic Methodology 20 (3):262 - 267 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Julian Reiss correctly identified a trilemma about economic models: we cannot maintain that they are false, but nevertheless explain and that only true accounts explain. In this reply we give reasons to reject the second premise ? that economic models explain. Intuitions to the contrary should be distrusted

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reply to Julian Reiss.Menno Rol - 2013 - Journal of Economic Methodology 20 (3):244 - 249.
Paradox postponed.Daniel M. Hausman - 2013 - Journal of Economic Methodology 20 (3):250 - 254.
How fictional accounts can explain.Robert Sugden - 2013 - Journal of Economic Methodology 20 (3):237 - 243.
Genuineness resolved: a reply to Reiss' purported paradox.Till Grüne-Yanoff - 2013 - Journal of Economic Methodology 20 (3):255 - 261.
Economic models and historical explanation.Steven Rappaport - 1995 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25 (4):421-441.
The explanation paradox redux.Julian Reiss - 2013 - Journal of Economic Methodology 20 (3):280 - 292.
The Modal View and Defending Microeconomics.Steven Rappaport - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:289 - 297.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-19

Downloads
229 (#90,792)

6 months
44 (#106,717)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Robert Northcott
Birkbeck, University of London
Anna Alexandrova
Cambridge University