Is Dupras and Bunnik’s Framework for Assessing Privacy Risks in Multi-Omic Research and Databases Still Too Exceptionalist?

&
American Journal of Bioethics 21 (12):80-82 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Dupras and Bunnik’s strong statement against the normative approach of genetic exceptionalism, which can no longer be justified in the midst of multi-omic research, is of great importance fo...

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/15265161.2021.1991039

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Whose Data Are They Anyway? Identification of Relatives and Genetic Exceptionalism.Robert I. Field - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (12):78-79.
Toward a Framework for Assessing Privacy Risks in Multi-Omic Research and Databases.Charles Dupras & Eline M. Bunnik - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (12):46-64.
Scrutinizing Privacy in Multi-Omics Research: How to Provide Ethical Grounding for the Identification of Privacy-Relevant Data Properties.C. W. Safarlou, A. L. Bredenoord, R. Vermeulen & K. R. Jongsma - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (12):73-75.
Exceptionalism, Information Categories and the Relevance of Gender.Ruth Chadwick - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (12):65-67.
Whose Data, Whose Risk? Omics Privacy Concerns Should be Defined by Individuals, not Researchers.Sabrina F. Derrington, Matthew A. Deardorff, Alexander R. Judkins & Xiaowu Gai - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (12):67-70.
Data Properties or Analytical Methodologies: Too Much Attention to the Former Ignores Concerns About the Latter.Mathias Brochhausen & D. Micah Hester - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (12):70-72.
Ownership of Genetic Data: Between Universalism and Contextualism?Henri-Corto Stoeklé & Christian Hervé - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (12):75-77.
A Framework for Analyzing and Comparing Privacy States.Alan Rubel & Ryan Biava - 2014 - JASIST: The Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 65 (12):2422-2431.
Privacy in the information age: Stakeholders, interests and values. [REVIEW]Lucas Introna & Athanasia Pouloudi - 1999 - Journal of Business Ethics 22 (1):27 - 38.
Privacy issues in a psychiatric context: applying the ISD privacy framework to a psychiatric behavioural monitoring system. [REVIEW]Rusyaizila Ramli & Nasriah Zakaria - 2014 - AI and Society 29 (2):203-213.
Privacy and policy for genetic research.Judith Wagner DeCew - 2004 - Ethics and Information Technology 6 (1):5-14.
Physicians Must Discuss Potential Long-Term Risks of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation to Ensure Informed Consent.Eline M. Bunnik, Nikkie Aarts & Lea Ann Chen - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (5):61-63.
An Architecture for Privacy in a Networked Health Information Environment.Carol Diamond, Melissa Goldstein, David Lansky & Stefaan Verhulst - 2008 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 17 (4):429-440.
“Giving something back”: a systematic review and ethical enquiry into public views on the use of patient data for research in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland.Jessica Stockdale, Jackie Cassell & Elizabeth Ford - 2019 - Wellcome Open Research 3 (6).
Influence of Demographic Characteristics of Participants on Consent to Genomic Research into Congenital Heart Disease.Charles Dupras Gregor Andelfinger - 2014 - Journal of Clinical Research and Bioethics 5 (5).

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-11-22

Downloads
39 (#408,642)

6 months
21 (#126,325)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Karla Karoline Sonne Kalinka Alex
University of Heidelberg

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references