The Progressive Legal Perspective of Legal Justice in Customary Dispute Resolution Related to Natural Resources

Jurnal Ius 11 (2):225-236 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The absence of special arrangements regarding customary law has the potential to cause inferiority in the position of customary law compared to the substance of national law in customary disputes relating to natural resources. This study seeks to analyze and formulate the idea of ​​resolving customary disputes over the management of natural resources in a progressive legal perspective to achieve justice. The results of the study confirmed that the problems of customary disputes related to the management of natural resources, especially those that occurred in the territories of indigenous peoples, made the position of customary law weaker compared to national law. This happens because regulations regarding indigenous peoples have not been ratified. Legal efforts to settle natural resource customary disputes to achieve justice in a progressive legal perspective need to be regulated through the establishment of a Perppu (Government Regulation in Lieu of Law) to facilitate the position of customary law in resolving customary disputes in the field of natural resource management. In the Perppu, it is hoped that there will be confirmation regarding the enactment of the conception of legal pluralism so that customary law has an equal position with national law in customary disputes over natural resource management.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On The Sufficiency of Legal Arguments.Li Zhao & Ming Yuan - 2007 - Modern Philosophy 2:118-122.
The publicity "defect" of customary law.Varun Gauri - 2012 - In Brian Z. Tamanaha, Caroline Mary Sage & Michael J. V. Woolcock (eds.), Legal pluralism and development: scholars and practitioners in dialogue. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Continental perspectives on natural law theory and legal positivism.Jes Bjarup - 2004 - In Martin P. Golding & William A. Edmundson (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 287--299.
Social justice and legal justice.Wojciech Sadurski - 1984 - Law and Philosophy 3 (3):329 - 354.
Administrative justice.Simon Halliday & Colin Scott - 2010 - In Peter Cane & Herbert M. Kritzer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research. Oxford University Press.
Legal Translation Versus Legal Interpretation. A Legal-Theoretical Perspective.Mateusz Zeifert & Zygmunt Tobor - 2021 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 35 (5):1671-1687.
Law after modernity.Sionaidh Douglas-Scott - 2013 - Portland, Or.: Hart.
solving The Chronological Paradox In Customary International Law: A Hartian Approach.David Lefkowitz - 2008 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 21 (1):128-148.
Feminist legal theory: outline of the issue.Cabaj Janusz - 2010 - Białostockie Studia Prawnicze 8.
An Enquiry on the Origins of Injustice in Legal Systems.John Charles Anderson - 1995 - Dissertation, The Catholic University of America

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-11-02

Downloads
5 (#1,546,433)

6 months
4 (#799,214)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references