Conflict talk and argumentative strategies in highly adversarial talk shows: The case of Al-Jazeera’s The Opposite Direction

Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 9 (1):93-121 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This study examines the conflict strategies used in the highly adversarial and popular Arabic-language talk show broadcasted weekly on Al-Jazeera satellite channel, known as Al-Ittijah Al-Mu’aakis 'The Opposite Direction'. The study identifies the conflict strategies and verbal conflict expressions and approaches them in the light of Interactional Sociolinguistics. The analysis of three episodes debating three different topics shows that disputants used several types of strategies including "impoliteness", "aggravated impoliteness", topic restriction, lengthy holding of the floor, and sarcasm. The speakers' bald-on-record expressions of disagreement are expected as a result of the controversial and polemical nature of the show, which creates fierce competition between the two guests to present their arguments in an aggressive way.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why There Cannot be Any Such Thing as “Time Travel”.Rupert Read - 2011 - Philosophical Investigations 35 (2):138-153.
Disagreements in Iranian dissertation defenses.Ahmad Izadi - 2013 - Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 9 (2):199-224.
‘Father knows best’: Therapy as entertainment.Marcia Macaulay - 2014 - Pragmatics and Society 5 (2):296-316.
Ian Ramsey on Talk about God (Continued).Donald Evans - 1971 - Religious Studies 7 (3):213 - 226.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-01-11

Downloads
32 (#496,853)

6 months
11 (#232,073)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references