«Філософ» і «філософія» в києворуських пам’ятках хі–хiv ст.: Історіографія термінологічних та концептуальних інтерпретацій

Sententiae 39 (2):64-91 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It remains largely unknown what was knowledge of philosophy by writers in Kyivan Rus’ of the 11th – 14th centuries. Moreover, there are no methodological foundations of resolving the issue. I suggest the key to the solution is the analysis of the meanings of words “philoso-phy” and “philosophers” in the texts of that time. This article aims to analyse how different researchers interpreted the meanings of these words in Kyivan Rus’ written sources of the 11th – 14th centuries. Use of the word “philosophy” was interpreted by the researchers in six different ways: as an approximate synonym for the word “education”, but also as a pagan or Christian wisdom, as theology, as an allegorical method of interpreting Scripture, and as the knowledge of the nature of things. Some researchers emphasized one of the meanings, but others opted for a “plural-istic approach”, considering that Kyivan writers used the word in different meanings at the same time. The same is true about the word “philosopher”. It referred to an educated man, an ancient philosopher, a Christian thinker, a theologian etc. Another approach in the interpreta-tion of these terms suggested Vilen Horskyi, distinguishing formal and essential properties of words “philosophy” and “philosopher”. He finds that the essential feature of philosophy was deification, a process whose aim is likeness to God, and cognition of God’s wisdom. Furthermore, according to Horskyi, in the philosopher the link between his knowledge and his action was inextricable.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Polysemy in Arabic and The Qasīda of ʾUjūz.Ömer Yildiz - 2024 - Tasavvur - Tekirdag Theology Journal 9 (2):1495-1511.
Editorial Preface.Tadashi Ogawa - 1995 - The Monist 78 (1):3-4.
Are Meanings in the Head? Ingarden’s Theory of Meaning.Chrudzimski Arkadiusz - 1999 - Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 30 (3):306-326.
Can Christian talk about God be literal?Jan Muis - 2011 - Modern Theology 27 (4):582-607.
On Biblical Logicism.Alexander Brungs & Frédéric Goubier - 2009 - Recherches de Theologie Et Philosophie Medievales 76 (1):199-244.
On Biblical Logicism - Wyclif, virtus sermonis and Equivocation.Alexander Brungs & Frederic Goubier - 2009 - Recherches de Theologie Et Philosophie Medievales 76 (1):199-244.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-06-20

Downloads
2 (#1,450,151)

6 months
1 (#1,912,481)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?