Can Christian talk about God be literal?

Modern Theology 27 (4):582-607 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article discusses whether Christian talk about God can be literal. First, it is argued that the meaning of a word cannot be reduced to its use, that metaphorical language is indirect in its use of words, and that the change of meaning of a word by analogical extension differs from the change of meaning by repeated metaphorical use. Next, it is shown that in Christian talk about God, God can be literally referred to by God's proper name, “YHWH,” and by words that in contexts of prayer and praise function as proper names. Then it is argued that terms for non‐basic actions can be literally applied to the Christian God, and that some of God's essential properties can be literally described on the basis of his self‐revealing actions

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,363

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Davidson, a Metáfora e os Domínios do Literal.Waldomiro José Filho da Silva - 2001 - Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana 6 (15):30-43.
Sin and Addiction: Alcoholics Anonymous and the Soul of Christian Sin-Talk.William McDonough - 2012 - Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics 32 (1):39-55.
Malapropisms and Davidson's Theories of Literal Meaning.John Michael McGuire - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 6:93-97.
The Talk I Was Supposed to Give….Achille C. Varzi - 2006 - In Andrea Bottani & Richard Davies (eds.), Modes of Existence: Papers in Ontology and Philosophical Logic. Ontos Verlag. pp. 131–152.
Is Literal Meaning Conventional?Andrei Marmor - 2008 - Topoi 27 (1-2):101-113.
Taking desirelessness () seriously.Christopher G. Framarin - 2005 - Asian Philosophy 15 (2):143 – 155.
Revisiting the Contribution of Literal Meaning to Legal Meaning.Brian Flanagan - 2010 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 30 (2):255-271.
“It Says What It Says”.Lars Hertzberg - 2011 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 85 (4):589-603.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
8 (#988,891)

6 months
1 (#451,398)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Duns Scotus’ univocity: applied to the debate on phenomenological theology.Guus H. Labooy - 2014 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 76 (1):53-73.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references