Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Public Engagement with Human Germline Editing Requires Specification.Boy Vijlbrief, Sam Riedijk & Eline M. Bunnik - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (12):77-79.
    Scheinerman (2023) proposes a Citizen’s Jury on human germline genome editing (HGGE) to promote more inclusive public engagement, agenda setting and governance. She argues these juries should work...
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Initial heritable genome editing: mapping a responsible pathway from basic research to the clinic.Robert Ranisch, Katharina Trettenbach & Gardar Arnason - 2023 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 26 (1):21-35.
    Following the Second Summit on Human Gene Editing in Hong Kong in 2018, where the birth of two girls with germline genome editing was revealed, the need for a responsible pathway to the clinical application of human germline genome editing has been repeatedly emphasised. This paper aims to contribute to the ongoing discussion on research ethics issues in germline genome editing by exploring key issues related to the initial applications of CRISPR in reproductive medicine. Following an overview of the current (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Inclusion by Invitation Only? Public Engagement beyond Deliberation in the Governance of Innovative Biotechnology.Callum Gunn & Karin Jongsma - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (12):79-82.
    From their interpretation of the Australian Citizens’ Jury on genome editing, Scheinerman (2023) concludes that inclusive and diverse deliberative processes of public engagement have salient benefi...
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations