Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Aristotle's Metaphysics Z 13.Henry Teloh - 1979 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 9 (1):77 - 89.
    Aristotle states in Metaphysics Z13 that nothing said universally τῶν ϰαϑόλου λεγομένων is substance, rather the substance of each thing is particular to it. The natural interpretation of this statement is that being said universally is a sufficient condition for not being substance. But this claim is very perplexing since it is the key premiss in the following apparently inconsistent set:Form is substance.Form is universal.Nothing universal or said universally is substance, rather the substance of something is particular ἴδιος to it.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Form in Aristotle: Universal or Particular?R. D. Sykes - 1975 - Philosophy 50 (193):311 - 331.
  • The Underlying Argument of Aristotle’s Metaphysics Z.3.Jerry Green - 2014 - Phronesis 59 (4):321-342.
    This paper argues that Aristotle’s Metaphysics Z.3 deploys a reductio against the claim that ‘substances underlie by being the subjects of predication’, in order to demonstrate the need for a new explanation of how substances underlie. Z.13 and H.1 corroborate this reading: both allude to an argument originally contained in Z.3, but now lost from our text, that form, matter and compound ‘underlie’ in different ways. This helps explain some of Z’s peculiarities—and it avoids committing Aristotle to self-contradiction about whether (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • As formas substanciais na Metafísica de Aristóteles.Pedro Teixeira Zanchin - 2022 - Dissertation, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Sul
  • Aristotle's Metaphysics Z 13.Henry Teloh - 1979 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 9 (1):77-89.
    Aristotle states in Metaphysics Z13 that nothing said universally τῶν ϰαϑόλου λεγομένων is substance, rather the substance of each thing is particular to it. The natural interpretation of this statement is that being said universally is a sufficient condition for not being substance. But this claim is very perplexing since it is the key premiss in the following apparently inconsistent set:Form is substance.Form is universal.Nothing universal or said universally is substance, rather the substance of something is particular ἴδιος to it.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Partikularitet og universalitet I Aristoteles' formlære- skitse af en position.Morten Hansen - 2004 - Res Cogitans 1 (1).
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Substância e Unidade em Aristóteles.Mateus Ricardo Fernandes Ferreira - 2008 - Dissertation, University of Campinas