Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Just War Tradition: A Model for Healthcare Ethics.Chaplain John D. Connolly - 2018 - HEC Forum 30 (2):133-152.
    Healthcare ethics committees, physicians, surgeons, nurses, families, and patients themselves are constantly under pressure to make appropriate medically ethical decisions concerning patient care. Various models for healthcare ethics decisions have been proposed throughout the years, but by and large they are focused on making the initial ethical decision. What follows is a proposed model for healthcare ethics that considers the most appropriate decisions before, during, and after any intervention. The Just War Tradition is a model that is thorough in its (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Reimagining Just War as Anchored in, Tethered to, and Tempered by Mercy.Tobias Winright - 2020 - Journal of Religious Ethics 48 (3):436-457.
    This essay considers whether the just war tradition is compatible with Christian theologically grounded conceptions of mercy. After considering and rejecting positions that pit mercy and war against each other, the essay mines the work of Walter Kasper and James Keenan on Christian mercy to develop a position that reimagines mercy as compatible with traditional just war criteria. In particular, this analysis leads to the conclusion that Christians may endorse just war in the form of humanitarian intervention. By doing so, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Aquinas's Opposition to Killing the Innocent and its Distinctiveness within the Christian just War Tradition.Daniel H. Weiss - 2017 - Journal of Religious Ethics 45 (3):481-509.
    This essay argues that Aquinas's position regarding the killing of innocent people differs significantly from other representatives of the Christian just war tradition. While his predecessors, notably Augustine, as well as his successors, from Cajetan and Vitoria onward, affirm the legitimacy of causing the death of innocents in a just war in cases of necessity, Aquinas holds that causing the death of innocents in a foreseeable manner, whether intentionally or indirectly, is never justified. Even an otherwise legitimate act of just (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Looking Inward Together: Just War Thinking and Our Shared Moral Emotions.Valerie Morkevičius - 2017 - Ethics and International Affairs 31 (4):441-451.
    Just war thinking serves a social and psychological role that international law cannot fill. Law is dispassionate and objective, while just war thinking accounts for emotions and the situatedness of individuals. While law works on us externally, making us accountable to certain people and institutions, just war thinking affects us internally, making us accountable to ourselves. Psychologically, an external focus leads to feelings of shame, while an inward focus generates feelings of guilt. Philosophers have long recognized the importance of these (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Success and the aftermath of surrender.Yuchun Kuo - 2014 - Journal of Global Ethics 10 (1):101-113.
    This paper first argues that a state can justifiably fight a hopeless war of self-defense when its enemy determines to massacre its people after it surrenders or is defeated. The main reason is that, in this situation, even if the victim state surrenders, it still has to suffer from harms that are similar to or worse than the harms involved in fighting a hopeless war. This paper then discusses some complicated issues raised by applying this argument to various situations in (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation