- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Works by Pitte, M. M. Van de (exact spelling)
Order:
- Comments on a claim that some phenomenological statements may be a posteriori.M. M. Van de Pitte - 1984 - Metaphilosophy 15 (3-4):248-255.
- Husserl: The Idealist Malgre Lui.M. M. Van De Pitte - 1976 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 37 (1):70-78.
- Is there a phenomenological method?M. M. Van de Pitte - 1977 - Metaphilosophy 8 (1):21-35.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-747975fc64-2hs6p uwo