7 found
  1.  37
    What makes law law: categorial trends in analytic legal metaphysics.Triantafyllos Gkouvas - 2023 - Jurisprudence 14 (4):480-509.
    Appeals to metaphysics have lately come to ascendancy in analytic legal philosophy. Over the last 20 years or so, a new discourse framework has emerged in analytic legal metaphysics that focusses on the explanatory question of how law is made. By any measure the most influential refinement of this question is to be found in Mark Greenberg's seminal 2004 article How Facts Make Law. This essay tries to exert some pressure on this familiar question by posing the categorial question of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
  2.  14
    Beyond the Legal Vernacular: Linguistic Content, Truth and Strategy in Legal Discourse.Triantafyllos Gkouvas - 2015 - Jurisprudence 6 (3):635-643.
  3.  19
    Planning from a Legal Point of View.Triantafyllos Gkouvas - 2016 - Jurisprudence 7 (2):341-354.
    Legality is a monograph scoring distinct contributions across the board of jurisprudential discourse. Among the most prominent arguments marshalled in this book is an impressively robust defence of reductionism about legal norms. The concept of a plan is invoked in the service of delivering a formidable task, that of disembarrassing the legal philosopher of the quest for what makes legal norms metaphysically distinct. The answer is simple, yet relies on an intricate chain of arguments: talk of legal norms is just (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
  4. Preliminary remarks on a theory of legal normativity.Triantafyllos Gkouvas & George Pavlakos - 2011 - In Jerzy Stelmach & Bartosz Brożek (eds.), The normativity of law. Kraków: Copernicus Center Press.
  5.  47
    Resisting Perspectivalism about Law: The Scope of Jurisprudential Disagreement.Triantafyllos Gkouvas - 2017 - Jurisprudence 8 (2):205-229.
    Even though the acknowledgment of the possibility of disagreement about the grounds of legal facts tends to acquire the shell of a mainstream view, the available regimentations of grounding disagreements in law limit their scope to two mutually exclusive jurisprudential variants. Ronald Dworkin’s original conception of theoretical disagreement as being about the responsibilities of government vis-à-vis its citizens is distinctly evaluative thereby excluding legal positivists from meaningful participation. An alternative descriptive variant has been recently defended by Scott Shapiro which replicates, (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Export citation  
  6. Rethinking the legal effect of interpretive canons.Triantafyllos Gkouvas - 2022 - In Gonzalo Villa Rosas & Jorge Luis Fabra-Zamora (eds.), Objectivity in jurisprudence, legal interpretation and practical reasoning. Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Export citation  
  7.  28
    The practicality of pure reason. A normative defence of Kant’s theory of moral motivation.Triantafyllos Gkouvas - 2011 - Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 14:152-191.
    El propósito de este trabajo es defender la opinión que Kant ha propuesto sobre la teoría internalista de la motivación moral. En particular, argumentaré que la adopción de Kant de internalismo se evidencia en su afirmación de que la relación de la razón pura de la voluntad se basa en una práctica una proposición sintética a priori. Lo que se pretende demostrar es que Kant trata la sinteticidad práctica como un concepto fundamental para su relato de lo que significa ser (...)
    Direct download  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   1 citation