6 found
Order:
  1. (1 other version)When is a Maxim fully universalizable ?Paul Dietrichson - 1964 - Kant Studien 55 (1-4):143-170.
  2.  28
    Ii. introduction to a reappraisal of fear and trembling.Paul Dietrichson - 1969 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 12 (1-4):236 – 245.
    The idea of a knighthood of faith which involves a ?teleological suspension of the ethical? is the most arresting feature of Kierkegaard's Fear and Trembling. It amounts to a theological shock treatment. It is therefore understandable that critics and commentators who have discussed Fear and Trembling have focused their attention almost exclusively on this extreme notion of faith. Their preoccupation has been unfortunate, however.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  60
    Kierkegaard's concept of the self.Paul Dietrichson - 1965 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 8 (1-4):1 – 32.
    Anti?Climacus (Kierkegaard) maintains that the self is, not the human psycho?physical synthesis of polarities, but the synthesis or relation ?related to itself?, which is ?freedom?. The author shows that this type of freedom or selfhood, though attained by free choice, is not itself freedom of choice. He contends that Anti?Climacus? statement about the self is too abstract and elliptical to be understood adequately from The Sickness Unto Death alone but is intelligible in terms of Judge William's doctrine of ?choosing oneself? (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  13
    Melvin Rader 1903 - 1981.Paul Dietrichson - 1983 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 56 (3):406 - 407.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  65
    What does Kant mean by 'acting from duty'?Paul Dietrichson - 1962 - Kant Studien 53 (1-4):277-288.
  6.  38
    Reinhold Niebuhr: His Religious, Social, and Political Thought. [REVIEW]Paul Dietrichson - 1957 - Philosophical Review 66 (3):421-423.