Order:
  1.  9
    Doctors and Pain Patients Avoid “Ruan” in the Supreme Court.Mark A. Rothstein, Mary E. Dyche & Julia Irzyk - 2022 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 50 (4):841-847.
    Physicians’ fear of criminal prosecution for prescribing opioid analgesics is a major reason why many chronic pain patients are having an increasingly difficult time obtaining medically appropriate pain relief. In Ruan v. United States, 142 S. Ct. 2370 (2022), the Supreme Court unanimously vacated two federal convictions under the Controlled Substances Act. The Court held that the government must prove that the defendant knowingly or intentionally acted in an unauthorized manner.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  6
    Employer Liability for “Take-Home” COVID-19.Mark A. Rothstein & Julia Irzyk - 2021 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 49 (1):126-131.
    Workplace exposure to SARS-CoV-2 has sickened workers and, subsequently, their family members. Family members might be able to recover from the employer in a negligence action using “take-home” liability theory.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  5
    Physician Liability for Suicide after Negligent Tapering of Opioids.Mark A. Rothstein & Julia Irzyk - 2022 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 50 (1):184-189.
    The precipitous and medically contraindicated reduction or “tapering” of opioids for patients with chronic pain due to serious medical conditions has caused needless suffering and, increasingly, suicide. Physicians could be liable for wrongful death based on negligent tapering of opioids.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark