Doctors and Pain Patients Avoid “Ruan” in the Supreme Court

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 50 (4):841-847 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Physicians’ fear of criminal prosecution for prescribing opioid analgesics is a major reason why many chronic pain patients are having an increasingly difficult time obtaining medically appropriate pain relief. In Ruan v. United States, 142 S. Ct. 2370 (2022), the Supreme Court unanimously vacated two federal convictions under the Controlled Substances Act. The Court held that the government must prove that the defendant knowingly or intentionally acted in an unauthorized manner.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Opioids May be Appropriate for Chronic Pain.Paul J. Christo - 2020 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 48 (2):241-248.
Maximizing the Value of Electronic Prescription Monitoring Programs.David B. Brushwood - 2003 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 31 (1):41-54.
Maximizing the Value of Electronic Prescription Monitoring Programs.David B. Brushwood - 2003 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 31 (1):41-54.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-03-10

Downloads
9 (#1,269,071)

6 months
7 (#591,670)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references