5 found
Order:
  1.  33
    Attentional capture by emotional faces is contingent on attentional control settings.Daniel Barratt & Claus Bundesen - 2012 - Cognition and Emotion 26 (7):1223-1237.
    Attentional capture by schematic emotional faces was investigated in two experiments using the flanker task devised by Eriksen and Eriksen (1974). In Experiment 1, participants were presented with a central target (a schematic face that was either positive or negative) flanked by two identical distractors, one on either side (schematic faces that were positive, negative, or neutral). The objective was to identify the central target as quickly as possible. The impact of the flankers depended on their emotional expression. Consistent with (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  2.  32
    How Context Influences Our Perception of Emotional Faces: A Behavioral Study on the Kuleshov Effect.Marta Calbi, Katrin Heimann, Daniel Barratt, Francesca Siri, Maria A. Umiltà & Vittorio Gallese - 2017 - Frontiers in Psychology 8.
  3.  96
    "Twist blindness" : the role of primacy, priming, schemas, and reconstructive memory in a first-time viewing of The Sixth Sense.Daniel Barratt - 2009 - In Warren Buckland (ed.), Puzzle films: complex storytelling in contemporary cinema. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 62--87.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  18
    Unpacking noun-noun compounds: Interpreting novel and conventional foodnames in isolation and on food labels.Viktor Smith, Daniel Barratt & Jordan Zlatev - 2014 - Cognitive Linguistics 25 (1):99-147.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  2
    Is threat the only modulator of attentional selectivity? Redefining the Easterbrook hypothesis.Thomas A. Sã¸Rensen & Daniel Barratt - 2014 - Frontiers in Psychology 5.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark