Results for ' classical eyelid conditioning'

999 found
Order:
  1.  27
    Classical eyelid conditioning as a function of sustained and shifted interstimulus intervals.Harvey C. Ebel & William F. Prokasy - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (1):52.
  2.  39
    Differential classical eyelid conditioning as a function of CS intensity, CS rise time, and interstimulus interval.Susan M. Wilcox & Leonard E. Ross - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 82 (2):272.
  3.  26
    Subject awareness in differential classical eyelid conditioning.William A. Benish & David A. Grant - 1980 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 15 (6):431-432.
  4.  23
    Hemispheric processing in differential classical eyelid conditioning.William A. Benish & David A. Grant - 1980 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 15 (6):433-434.
  5.  17
    Intrastimulus conflict in differential classical eyelid conditioning.William A. Benish & David A. Grant - 1980 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 15 (6):428-430.
  6.  25
    Trace and delay differential classical eyelid conditioning in human adults.Susan M. Ross, Leonard E. Ross & Deborah Werden - 1974 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 3 (3):224-226.
  7.  45
    Response shaping at long interstimulus intervals in classical eyelid conditioning.William F. Prokasy, Harvey C. Ebel & Donald D. Thompson - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 66 (2):138.
  8.  31
    Stimulus fluctuation, reactive inhibition, and time between trials in classical eyelid conditioning.William F. Prokasy - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 70 (5):464.
  9.  25
    Interaction of habit (h) and drive (d) in classical eyelid conditioning: H and D as functions of ucs intensity.James J. Hug & John J. Porter - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (1):150.
  10.  29
    Effects of unconditioned stimulus intensity and schedules of 50% partial reinforcement in human classical eyelid conditioning.Dennis L. Foth & Willard N. Runquist - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (2):244.
  11.  20
    Yoked comparisons of instrumental and classical eyelid conditioning.John W. Moore & I. Gormezano - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 62 (6):552.
  12.  22
    Effects of omitted versus delayed UCS on classical eyelid conditioning under partial reinforcement.John W. Moore & Isidore Gormezano - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (3):248.
  13.  24
    The partial-reinforcement effect sustained through blocks of continuous reinforcement in classical eyelid conditioning.Sally L. Perry & John W. Moore - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (2):158.
  14.  24
    Comparison of trace and delay classical eyelid conditioning as a function of interstimulus interval.Susan M. Ross & Leonard E. Ross - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 91 (1):165.
  15.  28
    Intertrial responding and CS intensity in classical eyelid conditioning.Michaela Mattson & John W. Moore - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (4):396.
  16.  25
    Eyelid conditioning performance when the mode of reinforcement is changed from classical to instrumental avoidance and vice versa.Joseph B. Hellige & David A. Grant - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (4):710.
  17.  14
    How long do relational representations in the hippocampus last during classical eyelid conditioning?Donald B. Katz & Joseph E. Steinmetz - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (3):484-485.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  18.  24
    Differential classical and avoidance eyelid conditioning.Dominic W. Massaro & John W. Moore - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (2):151.
  19.  24
    Classical and instrumental eyelid conditioning.Gregory A. Kimble, Lucie I. Mann & Robert H. Dufort - 1955 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 49 (6):407.
  20.  30
    Transfer of eyelid conditioning from instrumental to classical reinforcement and vice versa.David A. Grant, Neal E. A. Kroll, Barry Kantowitz, Michael J. Zajano & Kenneth B. Solberg - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 82 (3):503.
  21.  34
    Arithmetic correctness as the discriminandum in classical and differential eyelid conditioning.Robert A. Fleming, David A. Grant & Jane A. North - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (2):286.
  22.  14
    Truth and falsity of verbal statements as conditioned stimuli in classical and differential eyelid conditioning.Robert A. Fleming, David A. Grant & Jane A. North - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (1):178.
  23.  18
    Performance in eyelid conditioning following changes in reinforcement schedule.Willard N. Runquist - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (6):617.
  24.  17
    Supplementary report: Yoked comparisons of classical and avoidance eyelid conditioning under three UCS intensities.I. Gormezano, John W. Moore & Edward Deaux - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (5):551.
  25. Donald L. King.Classical Conditioning - 1983 - In Anees A. Sheikh (ed.), Imagery: Current Theory, Research, and Application. Wiley. pp. 156.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26.  24
    Classical conditioning of the rabbit eyelid response with mossy fiber stimulation as the conditioned stimulus.Joseph E. Steinmetz, David G. Lavond & Richard F. Thompson - 1985 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 23 (3):245-248.
  27.  18
    The engram found? Role of the cerebellum in classical conditioning of nictitating membrane and eyelid responses.David A. Mccormick, David G. Lavond, Gregory A. Clark, Ronald E. Kettner, Christina E. Rising & Richard F. Thompson - 1981 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 18 (3):103-105.
  28.  17
    Intrasession decrements in the performance of the classically conditioned eyelid reflex.Willard N. Runquist & William R. Muir - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 70 (5):520.
  29. Classical conditioning, awareness, and brain systems.Robert E. Clark, Joseph R. Manns & Larry R. Squire - 2002 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 (12):524-531.
  30.  28
    Classical conditioning without discrimination training: A test of the generalization theory of CS intensity effects.G. Robert Grice, Laraine Masters & David L. Kohfeld - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (4):510.
  31.  10
    A comparison of rate and contingency of classical and instrumental reinforcement upon the acquisition and extinction of the human eyelid CR.Robert A. Fleming & David A. Grant - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (4):488.
  32.  35
    Generalization gradients obtained from individual subjects following classical conditioning.Shepard Siegel, Eliot Hearst & Nancy George - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (1):171.
  33.  28
    Two-phase model for human classical conditioning.William F. Prokasy & Martha A. Harsanyi - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (3p1):359.
  34.  15
    Probability of conditioned responses as a function of variable intertrial intervals.Karl Haberlandt, Kevin C. Hails & Robert Leghorn - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (3):522.
  35.  17
    Differential eyelid conditioning based on opposing instrumental contingencies.Suzanne E. Kwaterski & John W. Moore - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (3p1):547.
  36.  33
    Effects of instructional set and UCS intensity on the latency, percentage, and form of the eyelid response.I. Gormezano & John W. Moore - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 63 (5):487.
  37.  9
    Eyelid conditioning as a function of intensity of conditioned and unconditioned stimuli.Evelyn G. Walker - 1960 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 59 (5):303.
  38.  21
    Differential eyelid conditioning as a function of the frequency and intensity of auditory CSs.John W. Moore - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (3):250.
  39.  12
    Differential eyelid conditioning as a function of the CS-UCS interval.Thomas F. Hartman & David A. Grant - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (2):131.
  40.  19
    Differential eyelid conditioning: Establishing differential responding prior to varying the probability of reinforcement.Frederick L. Newman & Julian Woodhouse - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (1):146.
  41.  22
    Eyelid conditioning as a function of unconditioned stimulus intensity and intertrial interval.William F. Prokasy Jr, David A. Grant & Nancy A. Myers - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 55 (3):242.
  42.  14
    Eyelid conditioning as a function of the CS-US interval.Wallace R. McAllister - 1953 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 45 (6):417.
  43.  19
    Eyelid conditioned responses with various levels of anxiety.Martin R. Baron & James P. Connor - 1960 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 60 (5):310.
  44.  9
    Differential eyelid conditioning to verbal stimuli varying in formal similarity.Dennis L. Foth & Willard N. Runquist - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (1):9.
  45.  16
    Differential eyelid conditioning as a function of stimulus similarity and strength of response to the CS.Malcolm D. Gynther - 1957 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 53 (6):408.
  46.  24
    Eyelid conditioning performance under partial reinforcement as a function of UCS intensity.Leonard E. Ross & Kenneth W. Spence - 1960 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 59 (6):379.
  47.  14
    Differential eyelid conditioning under equated drive as a function of the reinforcing UCS.Kenneth W. Spence & Blaine F. Tandler - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (1):35.
  48.  17
    Eyelid conditioning as a function of the inter-trial interval.Kenneth W. Spence & Eugenia B. Norris - 1950 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 40 (6):716.
  49.  12
    Eyelid conditioning performance as a function of emotion-producing instructions.Kenneth W. Spence & Henry Goldstein - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 62 (3):291.
  50.  21
    Eyelid conditioning as influenced by the presence of sensitized Beta-responses.David A. Grant & Eugenia B. Norris - 1947 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 37 (5):423.
1 — 50 / 999