Eyelid conditioning performance as a function of emotion-producing instructions

&
Journal of Experimental Psychology 62 (3):291 (1961)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0043915

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Performance changes in eyelid conditioning as related to the motivational and reinforcing properties of the UCS.M. A. Trapold & K. W. Spence - 1960 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 59 (4):209.
Performance in eyelid conditioning following interpolated presentations of the UCS.K. P. Goodrich, L. E. Ross & A. R. Wagner - 1957 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 53 (3):214.
Learning and performance in eyelid conditioning as a function of intensity of the UCS.Kenneth W. Spence - 1953 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 45 (1):57.
Effect of instructions upon eyelid conditioning.Margaret F. Nicholls & Gregory A. Kimble - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 67 (4):400.
Performance in eyelid conditioning as a function of UCS duration.W. N. Runquist & K. W. Spence - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 57 (4):249.
Effects of differential instructions, differential payoffs, and the presence or absence of feedback on the percentage, latency, and amplitude of the conditioned eyelid response.Harold D. Fishbein & I. Gormezano - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (4):535.
Eyelid conditioning as a function of unconditioned stimulus intensity and intertrial interval.William F. Prokasy Jr, David A. Grant & Nancy A. Myers - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 55 (3):242.
Stimulus generalization as a function of UCS intensity in eyelid conditioning.John J. Porter - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (3):311.
Eyelid conditioning performance under partial reinforcement as a function of UCS intensity.Leonard E. Ross & Kenneth W. Spence - 1960 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 59 (6):379.
Anxiety and strength of the UCS as determiners of the amount of eyelid conditioning.K. W. Spence & Janet Taylor - 1951 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 42 (3):183.
Backward conditioning of the eyelid response.J. M. Porter - 1938 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 23 (4):403.
Effect of instructions on responsiveness to the CS and to the UCS in GSR conditioning.Brian Harvey & Delos D. Wickens - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 87 (1):137.
Performance in eyelid conditioning following changes in reinforcement schedule.Willard N. Runquist - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (6):617.
The relation of electric shock and anxiety to level of performance in eyelid conditioning.Kenneth W. Spence, I. E. Farber & Elaine Taylor - 1954 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 48 (5):404.
Effects of omitted versus delayed UCS on classical eyelid conditioning under partial reinforcement.John W. Moore & Isidore Gormezano - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (3):248.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
11 (#1,045,260)

6 months
6 (#349,140)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references