Classical conditioning without discrimination training: A test of the generalization theory of CS intensity effects

, &
Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (4):510 (1966)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0023761

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Effect of discrimination training on auditory generalization.Herbert M. Jenkins & Robert H. Harrison - 1960 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 59 (4):246.
Effects of unconditioned stimulus intensity and schedules of 50% partial reinforcement in human classical eyelid conditioning.Dennis L. Foth & Willard N. Runquist - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (2):244.
Stimulus generalization as a function of UCS intensity in eyelid conditioning.John J. Porter - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (3):311.
CS intensity and CS-UCS interval effects in human eyelid conditioning.Harold D. Fishbein, Paul D. Jones & Colin Silverthorne - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (1):109.
Failures to obtain mediated generalization effects in eyelid conditioning.G. Robert Grice, Howard J. Simmons & John J. Hunter - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (5):485.
Second interval discrimination conditioning of the GSR as a function of UCS intensity and trace and delay conditioning paradigms.Arthur R. Zeiner - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (2p1):276.
Generalization gradients obtained from individual subjects following classical conditioning.Shepard Siegel, Eliot Hearst & Nancy George - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (1):171.
Intertrial responding and CS intensity in classical eyelid conditioning.Michaela Mattson & John W. Moore - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (4):396.
Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization.Harley M. Hanson - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (5):321.
Differential classical eyelid conditioning as a function of CS intensity, CS rise time, and interstimulus interval.Susan M. Wilcox & Leonard E. Ross - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 82 (2):272.
Differential effects of continuous extinction and discrimination training on the generalization gradient.Werner K. Honig, David R. Thomas & Norman Guttman - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (2):145.
Effects of nonreward in S+ and S- on performance in differential conditioning.James H. McHose, Frederick R. Maxwell & Earl R. McHewitt - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 88 (2):282.
The effects of drive and discrimination training on stimulus generalization.David R. Thomas - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (1):24.
Effects of ucs intensity upon conditioning and extinction of the gsr.F. W. Boring & M. C. Morrow - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (4):567.
Classical and instrumental eyelid conditioning.Gregory A. Kimble, Lucie I. Mann & Robert H. Dufort - 1955 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 49 (6):407.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
27 (#557,528)

6 months
6 (#431,022)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references