This text intends to point out aspects of the Aristotelian moral agency, which presupposes that there is something, the character, which supports the existence of strong lines from the point of view of behavior, morals, of our moral constitution, and which ends up defining the way in which we act, and therefore operating as something that really defines us. This notion of character is the majority among Aristotle’s commentators, although different interpretations can be defended about the scope of this character (...) disposition in Aristotle. This conception has spread over time, but it has been questioned - at least its more traditional reading - by recent studies on social psychology, which attenuates or rejects the idea of a character that supports our moral agency, stating that this is not the case, but the situations that determine the action. From this perspective, we especially have Nisbet, Ross, Doris and Harman, who, based on the results concerning experimental social psychology, even claim that there would not be what we understand by character, which would imply a serious problem for the well-known ethics of virtues, as this requires, in most of its formulations, the idea of ​​an absolutely robust character (Harman), which would allow us to predict the behavior of an agent in a given circumstance (Doris). (shrink)

Este artículo explora los antecedentes vanguardistas del radicalismo postmoderno, y para ello ofrece una crítica genealógica de este hilo temático en la ética postmoderna. Para empezar, el colapso del estructuralismo llevó a autores postestructuralistas/ postmodernos, como roland Barthes y Michel Foucault, a apelar a ámbitos como el cuerpo y a estrategias como la transgresión. estos autores tomaron esos ámbitos y estrategias de las vanguardias, cuya historia trazaremos a través del dadaísmo, el surrealismo y el situacionismo. estos movimientos de vanguardia, (...) además, inspiraron las apelaciones a ámbitos y estrategias similares de otros postmodernos, como Jean Baudrillard y Jean-François Lyotard. Pero, aunque hubo quienes permanecieron fieles a estos ámbitos y estrategias vanguardistas, rechazaron sin embargo el concepto de lo real con el que las vanguardias habían legitimado su ética. el artículo concluye explorando los problemas que este legado plantea a la postmodernidad, y cómo podrían resolverse. (shrink)

Neste ensaio, pretendemos evidenciar o marxismo crítico de Guy Debord a partir de uma revisitação de Maio de 1968. Cinquenta anos depois deste evento, com efeito, impõe‑se a pergunta: «Em que medida a definição situacionista da subjectividade anticapitalista ainda mantém a sua pertinência histórico‑crítica?» Não sendo simples, a resposta equivale, afinal, à avaliação do marxismo debordiano, tendo em vista discriminar, a seu respeito, o que está vivo e o que está morto.