Is Monotheism the Root Cause of the Ecological Crisis? Ecofeminist Conceptions of the God-Universe Relationship

Kader 21 (1):301-319 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article takes as its basis the claim that the root cause of the ecological crisis is based on theological reasons, especially the monotheistic conception of God in traditional Christianity. The article aims to evaluate the claim that the monotheist understanding of the God-universe relationship is the main cause of the ecological crisis, in the context of ecofeminism, which is one of the leading representatives of this claim. In the literature, which includes examining the ecological crisis with its theological dimensions, many studies evaluate the relationship between human beings and nature. In addition, some studies deal with the subject within the framework of the relationship between God and the universe, albeit relatively few. An important part of them consists of the studies done by ecofeminist theologians. The most distinctive feature of these studies is the critical attitude of ecofeminist theologians against traditional monotheism concerning the ecological crisis. At the center of the criticism is the emphasis on power and absolute transcendence among the attributes of God in the monotheist conception of God. According to ecofeminist theologians, the monotheist conception, which is claimed to represent the dominant understanding of God, especially in Western Christianity, supports a hierarchical God and universe relationship as a result of the application of the dualist perspective in explaining reality. In this hierarchical structure, God is portrayed as a being outside and beyond this world, who legitimizes power relations and enables the weak to be oppressed, therefore, the monotheistic God concept is strongly criticized by ecofeminist theologians. On the other hand, ecofeminist theologians propose pantheist and panentheist God conceptions, which are defended by two pioneer ecofeminist theologians Rosemary R. Ruether and Sally McFague, respectively, as an alternative to the traditional monotheist conception of God. In this study, in line with the mentioned purpose of the study, pantheist and panentheist interpretations proposed by ecofeminist theology and prominent among the God and universe relationship approaches in contemporary Christian philosophical theology are discussed in the context of ecological crisis. In this framework, this study evaluates some of the problems that arise in the application of ecofeminist discourse to the field of theology in terms of alternative God conceptions put forward by ecofeminist theologians. Based on this background, the study includes four chapters. First, the dimensions of the relationship between ecofeminism and theology have been revealed. Then, the main arguments of ecofeminist theology in its critique of the monotheist conception of God are evaluated. Then, pantheist and panentheist conceptions, the alternative God conceptions offered by ecofeminist theology against monotheism, are discussed. Finally, within the framework of the arguments it has put forward, an evaluation of ecofeminist theology and conceptions of God has been made in terms of contextual and methodological aspects.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Panteizm ve Panenteizm Tartışmaları Arasında Spinoza.M. Kazim Arican - 2013 - Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):17-32.
Monotheism and the Rise of Science.J. L. Schellenberg - 2020 - Cambridge University Press.
God(s) Many and One: On Polytheism and Monotheism.William Desmond - 2008 - In God and the Between. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 171–190.
The Environmental Crisis and Its Root Cause.Abraham Tsehay Jemberie - 2018 - Chintan Research Journal 8 (32):639-644.
Monotheism.Jacqueline A. Laing - 2012 - In George Kurian (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Christian Civilisation. Blackwell.
Monotheism, War, and Intellectual Leadership.Joe Frank Jones Iii - 2011 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 18 (1):102-114.
Monotheism, War, and Intellectual Leadership.Joe Frank Jones Iii - 2011 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 18 (1):102-114.
Monotheism and Existentialism.Deborah Casewell - 2022 - Cambridge University Press.
Toward an Ecological Ethic of Care.Deane Curtin - 1991 - Hypatia 6 (1):60 - 74.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-09-25

Downloads
20 (#761,466)

6 months
17 (#145,772)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sevcan Ozturk
Social Sciences University of Ankara

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The historical roots of our ecological crisis.Lynn White Jr - forthcoming - Environmental Ethics: Readings in Theory and Application, Belmont: Wadsworth Company.
Feminism and Ecology: Making Connections.Karen J. Warren - 1987 - Environmental Ethics 9 (1):3-20.

View all 6 references / Add more references