Is there a need for political liberalism to have an account of pre-overlapping consensus reasoning?

Filozofija I Društvo 25 (1):57-74 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In his Liberalism without Perfection, Jonathan Quong argues for internal conception of political liberalism which goal is to show that a liberal well-ordered society is internally coherent ideal and that citizens who would be raised in such society could endorse and support their own liberal institutions and principles if those institutions and principles are justified in particular way These institutions should be justified by particular conception of public reason which main feature is that overlapping consensus is the first stage of its justificatory structure. So, public reasoning of citizens in well-ordered society should be based solely on values and ideas inherent to liberal conception of justice - freedom, equality, fair system of cooperation and burdens of judgment. Another important feature of Quong?s conception of public reason concerns its scope. Quong argues for a wide scope of public reason which demands that all coercive or binding laws or public policies should be justified on basis of these values alone. Thus, reasonable citizens in well-ordered society by definition accord deliberative priority to public reasons over their other comprehensive or nonpublic beliefs whenever they exercise their collective political power over one another. The problem I raise in this paper is that it is very likely that in well-ordered society there will be a group of citizens that will not accord full deliberative priority to political values, especially not at all levels of political deliberation. On certain issues they will like to see their particular values being realized through common political institutions. If our political theory excludes this group from justificatory constituency on this particular issue or categorize them as unreasonable it can easily undermine their general adherence to liberal conception of justice and endanger stability of well-ordered society. Thus, my point is that we need a further development of political liberalism to solve such problems not as a part of non-ideal theory but as a part of its ideal of well-ordered society. nema

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Jonathan Quong’s Sectarian Political Liberalism.Kevin Vallier - 2017 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 11 (1):175-194.
On John Rawls and Public Reason.Jonah David Murdock - 1998 - Dissertation, Northwestern University
Introduction: Convergence Justifications in Public Reason.Kevin Vallier - 2011 - Public Affairs Quarterly 25 (4):257-260.
In Search of a Stable Consensus.Cyril Hédoin - 2023 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 24 (2).
Environmental values, pluralism, and stability.Ted Preston - 2004 - Ethics, Place and Environment 7 (1-2):73 – 83.
Three concepts of political stability: An agent-based model.Kevin Vallier - 2017 - Social Philosophy and Policy 34 (1):232-259.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-01

Downloads
10 (#1,221,414)

6 months
4 (#863,607)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?