Social Theory and Practice 43 (1):79-106 (2017)

Authors
Paul Billingham
Oxford University
Abstract
Debates between political liberals and liberal perfectionists have been reinvigorated by Jonathan Quong’s Liberalism Without Perfection. In this paper I argue that certain forms of perfectionism can rebut or evade Quong’s three central objections – that perfectionism is manipulative, paternalistic, and illegitimate. I then argue that perfectionists can defend an ‘internal conception’ of perfectionism, parallel in structure to Quong’s ’internal conception’ of political liberalism, but with a different conception of the justificatory constituency. None of Quong’s arguments show that his view should be preferred to this perfectionist internal conception. It can thus equally claim to achieve ‘justification to all reasonable citizens’.
Keywords Political liberalism  Liberal perfectionism  Jonathan Quong  Internal conception  Legitimacy  Paternalism
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0037-802X
DOI 10.5840/soctheorpract20174314
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Liberalism Without Perfection.Jonathan Quong - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Justification and Legitimacy.A. John Simmons - 1999 - Ethics 109 (4):739-771.
Legitimacy, Unanimity, and Perfectionism.Joseph Chan - 2000 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 29 (1):5-42.
The Problem of Paternal Motives.Chris Mills - 2013 - Utilitas 25 (4):446-462.
In Defence of Comprehensive Liberalism.Ben Colburn - 2012 - Philosophy and Public Issues - Filosofia E Questioni Pubbliche 2 (1):17-29.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

In Public Reason, Diversity Trumps Coherence.Kevin Vallier & Ryan Muldoon - 2021 - Journal of Political Philosophy 29 (2):211-230.
Towards a More Plural Political Theory of Pluralism.Corrado Fumagalli - 2020 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 47 (10):1154-1175.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Political Liberalism, the Internal Conception, and the Problem of Public Dogma.Thomas M. Besch - 2012 - Philosophy and Public Issues - Filosofia E Questioni Pubbliche 2 (1):153-177.
On Jonathan Quong’s Sectarian Political Liberalism.Kevin Vallier - 2017 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 11 (1):175-194.
Call for Papers: Political Liberalism Vs. Liberal Perfectionism. Gpellegrino - 2012 - Philosophy and Public Issues - Filosofia E Questioni Pubbliche.
Are Liberal Perfectionism and Neutrality Mutually Exclusive?Eldar Sarajlic - 2015 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 45 (4):515-537.
Liberalism Without Perfection.Jonathan Quong - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Liberalism Without Perfection: Replies to Gaus, Colburn, Chan, and Bocchiola.Jonathan Quong - 2012 - Philosophy and Public Issues - Filosofia E Questioni Pubbliche 2 (1):51-79.
Implications of Paternalism and Buck-Passing: A Reply to Quong.Mats Volberg - 2015 - Polish Journal of Philosophy 9 (1):91-108.
The Asymmetry Objection to Political Liberalism: Evaluation of a Defence.Terence Rajivan Edward - 2018 - E-Logos Electronic Journal for Philosophy 25 (1):26-32.
Respect for Persons and Perfectionist Politics.Thaddeus Metz - 2001 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 30 (4):417–442.
Mills Liberalism and Liberalism's Posterity.John Gray - 2000 - The Journal of Ethics 4 (1-2):137-165.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-11-20

Total views
462 ( #19,758 of 2,498,773 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
80 ( #9,408 of 2,498,773 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes