Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (3):595-614 (2015)

Authors
Michael Yudanin
University of Georgia
Abstract
Kant’s moral philosophy usually considers two types of duties: negative duties that prohibit certain actions and positive duties commanding action. With that, Kant insists on deriving all morality from reason alone. Such is the Categorical Imperative that Kant lays at the basis of ethics. Yet while negative duties can be derived from the Categorical Imperative and thus from reason, the paper argues that this is not the case with positive duties. After answering a number of attempts to derive positive duties from the Categorical Imperative, most notably those of Barbara Herman, it sketches an alternative approach to understanding the relationship between the universal moral law and specific moral contents
Keywords Ethics  Kant  Deontology  Categorical imperative  Positive duties  Negative duties
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10677-014-9546-4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,811
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Critique of Pure Reason.I. Kant - 1787/1998 - Philosophy 59 (230):555-557.
Creating the Kingdom of Ends.Christine M. Korsgaard - 1996 - Cambridge University Press.
Tractatus logico-philosophicus.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1922 - Filosoficky Casopis 52:336-341.
Naming and Necessity.S. Kripke - 1972 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 45 (4):665-666.
Practical Philosophy.Immanuel Kant - 1996 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Right and Coercion: Can Kant’s Conception of Right Be Derived From His Moral Theory?Marcus Willaschek - 2009 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (1):49 – 70.
Kantian Ethics and Global Justice.Kok-Chor Tan - 1997 - Social Theory and Practice 23 (1):53-73.
We Have No Positive Epistemic Duties.Mark Nelson - 2010 - Mind 119 (473):83-102.
Kantian Right and the Categorical Imperative: Response to Willaschek.Michael Nance - 2012 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 20 (4):541-556.
Basic Positive Duties of Justice and Narveson's Libertarian Challenge.Pablo Gilabert - 2006 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (2):193-216.
Kant's Conception of Inner Value.Oliver Sensen - 2011 - European Journal of Philosophy 19 (2):262-280.
Immanuel Kant, Jürgen Habermas and the Categorical Imperative.Anders Bordum - 2005 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 31 (7):851-874.
Kant's Ethics and Duties to Oneself.Lara Denis - 1997 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78 (4):321–348.
Kant, Hegel, and Determining Our Duties.Kenneth Westphal - 2005 - Jahrbuch für Recht and Ethik/Annual Review of Law & Ethics 13:335-354.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-10-28

Total views
93 ( #119,463 of 2,463,153 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #223,490 of 2,463,153 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes