- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Measuring the Consequences of Rules: A Reply to Smith
Utilitas 29 (1):125-131 (2017)
Abstract
In ‘Measuring the Consequences of Rules’, Holly Smith presents two problems involving the indeterminacy of compliance, which she takes to be fatal for all forms of rule-utilitarianism. In this reply, I attempt to dispel both problems.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Measuring the Consequences of Rules: Holly M. Smith.Holly M. Smith - 2010 - Utilitas 22 (4):413-433.
General Rules in the Moral Theories of Smith and Hume.Gabriela Remow - 2007 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 5 (2):119-134.
Smith´s analysis of human actions.Jasper Doomen - 2005 - Ethic@ - An International Journal for Moral Philosophy 4 (2):111–122.
Afterword: Reply By Steve Smith The ‘New Cuyama 4663’ Problem: A Reply to Norma Romm. [REVIEW]Stephen Lloyd Smith - 2011 - Philosophy of Management 10 (3):85-102.
Global Consequentialism.Philip Pettit & Michael Smith - 2000 - In Brad Hooker, Elinor Mason & Dale Miller (eds.), Morality, Rules and Consequences: A Critical Reader. Edinburgh University Press.
We Can Test the Experience Machine: Reply to Smith.Dan Weijers - 2012 - Ethical Perspectives 19 (2):261-268.
Normative marketing ethics redux, incorporating a reply to Smith.John F. Gaski - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 32 (1):19 - 34.
Morality, Rules, and Consequences: A Critical Reader.Brad Hooker, Elinor Mason, Dale E. Miller, D. W. Haslett, Shelly Kagan, Sanford S. Levy, David Lyons, Phillip Montague, Tim Mulgan, Philip Pettit, Madison Powers, Jonathan Riley, William H. Shaw, Michael Smith & Alan Thomas (eds.) - 2000 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Adverbialization, Nominalization and Lexical Options; A Reply.W. G. Klooster & H. J. Verkuyl - 1974 - Foundations of Language 11 (2):281-285.
Reasoning with Rules: An Essay on Legal Reasoning and its Underlying Logic.Jaap Hage - 1996 - Kluwer Academic Publishers.
In defense of the Smart aleck: A reply to Ted Honderich.Richard Duble - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Research 24 (January):305-9.
Hegel Decoder: A Reply to Smith's 'Reply'.John Rosenthal - 2001 - Historical Materialism 9 (1):111-151.
Analytics
Added to PP
2018-04-04
Downloads
781 (#19,925)
6 months
142 (#24,852)
2018-04-04
Downloads
781 (#19,925)
6 months
142 (#24,852)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Moral Education and Rule Consequentialism.Dale E. Miller - 2021 - Philosophical Quarterly 71 (1):120-140.
From Compliance, to Acceptance, to Teaching: On Relocating Rule Consequentialism's Stipulations.Timothy D. Miller - 2021 - Utilitas 33 (2):204-220.
References found in this work
Measuring the Consequences of Rules: Holly M. Smith.Holly M. Smith - 2010 - Utilitas 22 (4):413-433.
Introducing Variable-Rate Rule-Utilitarianism.Michael Ridge - 2006 - Philosophical Quarterly 56 (223):242 - 253.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-wg6s5 uwo