The uniqueness of local proper scoring rules: the logarithmic family

Theory and Decision 88 (2):315-322 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Local proper scoring rules provide convenient tools for measuring subjective probabilities. Savage, 783–801, 1971) has shown that the only local proper scoring rule for more than two exclusive events is the logarithmic family. We generalize Savage by relaxing the properness and the domain, and provide simpler proof.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

In Favor of Logarithmic Scoring.Randall G. McCutcheon - 2019 - Philosophy of Science 86 (2):286-303.
Accuracy, Verisimilitude, and Scoring Rules.Jeffrey Dunn - 2019 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 97 (1):151-166.
A Pragmatist’s Guide to Epistemic Utility.Benjamin Anders Levinstein - 2017 - Philosophy of Science 84 (4):613-638.
The Role of 'Dutch Books' and of 'Proper Scoring Rules'.Bruno De Finetti - 1981 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 32 (1):55 - 56.
The role of 'dutch books' and of 'proper scoring rules'.Bruno de Finetti - 1981 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 32 (1):55-56.
Scoring Imprecise Credences: A Mildly Immodest Proposal.Conor Mayo-Wilson & Gregory Wheeler - 2016 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 92 (1):55-78.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-11-03

Downloads
16 (#905,800)

6 months
4 (#787,709)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?