On the Logical Reconstruction of Conductive Arguments

In Bart Garssen & Frans van Eemeren (eds.), From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild: A Variety of Contributions to Argumentation Theory. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag. pp. 239-254 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a book published in 1971, Challenge and Response: Justification in Ethics, Carl Wellman introduces the notion of “Conduction” to refer to a particular type of reasoning.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,347

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Argumenty kondukcyjne.Marcin Selinger - 2014 - Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia 9 (4):53-63.
Conductive Arguments: Why is This Still a Thing?Kevin Possin - 2016 - Informal Logic 36 (4):563-593.
Are Conductive Arguments Possible?Jonathan Adler - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (3):245-257.
The Myth of Conductive Arguments.Kevin Possin - 2012 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 27 (3):29-33.
A Defense of Conduction: A Reply to Adler.J. Anthony Blair - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (2):109-128.
Weighing Considerations in Conductive Pro and Con Arguments.Thomas Fischer - 2011 - In John Anthony Blair & Ralph H. Johnson (eds.), Conductive Argument: A New Type of Defeasible Reasoning. College Publications. pp. 86-103.
Reconstructing Arguments: Formalization and Reflective Equilibrium.Georg Brun - 2014 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 17 (1):94-129.
Logische Rekonstruktion. Ein hermeneutischer Traktat.Friedrich Reinmuth - 2014 - Dissertation, University of Greifswald

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-10-23

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references