Agricultural technology, wealth, and responsibility

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 3 (1):21-35 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Responsibility as a dual to human rights is presented as a moral alternative to extended, complex systems of animal and ecological rights. This simple idea of responsibility is then applied to four levels of agricultural technology: animal (nature) rights, conservation, organization of agriculture, and people versus planet relationships. The stewardship argument is freed from at least some of the complications of animal rights and ecology, but leaves responsibility with humans to do the right thing.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Agricultural technology, wealth, and responsibility.Gene Wunderlich - 1990 - Journal of Agricultural Ethics 3 (1):21-35.
Returning to Eden: animal rights and human responsibility.Michael W. Fox (ed.) - 1980 - Malabar, Fla.: R.E. Krieger Pub. Co..
Ethics of animal use. [REVIEW]Gregory S. McElwain - 2009 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 22 (3):291-293.
Hunting as a Moral Good.Lawrence Cahoone - 2009 - Environmental Values 18 (1):67 - 89.
Introduction.Gary Comstock - 1991 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 4 (2):101-107.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
44 (#371,940)

6 months
10 (#308,797)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?