Replies to Sainsbury, Hale, Suarez

Philosophical Issues 10 (1):201 - 219 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2010

DOI

10.1111/j.1758-2237.2000.tb00022.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Hale on caesar.Peter Sullivan & Michael Potter - 1997 - Philosophia Mathematica 5 (2):135--52.
Suárez and the doctrine of the transcendentals.Jorge J. E. Gracia - 1992 - Topoi 11 (2):121-133.
Critical notice.Review author[S.]: R. M. Sainsbury - 1985 - Mind 94 (373):120-142.
Rejoinder To S A Rasmussen's Sainsbury On A Fregean Argument.R. M. Sainsbury - 1984 - Analysis 44 (June):111-113.
What Is Wrong with Abstraction?Michael Potter & Peter Sullivan - 2005 - Philosophia Mathematica 13 (2):187-193.
Review: Crispin Wright: Truth and Objectivity. [REVIEW]R. M. Sainsbury - 1996 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56 (4):899 - 904.
Suárez on continuous quantity.Jorge Secada - 2012 - In Benjamin Hill & Henrik Lagerlund (eds.), The Philosophy of Francisco Suárez. Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York.
Francisco suárez on consent and political obligation.Daniel Schwartz - 2008 - Vivarium 46 (1):59-81.
Nominalism and the contingency of abstract objects.Crispin Wright & Bob Hale - 1992 - Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):111-135.
Benacerraf's dilemma revisited.Bob Hale & Crispin Wright - 2002 - European Journal of Philosophy 10 (1):101–129.
The metaontology of abstraction.Bob Hale & Crispin Wright - 2009 - In David Chalmers, David Manley & Ryan Wasserman (eds.), Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford University Press. pp. 178-212.
A reductio ad surdum? Field on the contingency of mathematical objects.Bob Hale & Crispin Wright - 1994 - Mind 103 (410):169-184.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
8 (#1,291,989)

6 months
2 (#1,240,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

What's wrong with Moore's argument?James Pryor - 2004 - Philosophical Issues 14 (1):349–378.
Transmission Failure Explained.Martin Smith - 2009 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79 (1):164-189.
On the Truth-Conduciveness of Coherence.William Roche - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (S3):647-665.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references