Hume vs. Reid on ideas: The new Hume letter

Mind 96 (383):392-398 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the newly discovered letter Hume answers Reid's charge that he held a theory of ideas derived from his predecessors and criticizes Reid's own theory of innate ideas. He defends his own theory that ideas are derived from impressions. I discuss Reid's own puzzlement that in the first _Enquiry_ Hume ascribes a natural belief in necessary connections to the vulgar without an idea--and its influence on subsequent readings of Hume as a 'regularity theorist.' I argue that it was the 'Common Sense' school of philosophers following Reid, rather than Hume, who insisted that beliefs must be based on legitimate ideas.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Beyond impressions and ideas: Hume vs. Reid.Keith Lehrer - 1987 - The Monist 70 (4):383 - 397.
Beyond Impressions and Ideas.Keith Lehrer - 1987 - The Monist 70 (4):383-397.
Reid’s Critique of Berkeley and Hume.John Greco - 1995 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (2):279-296.
The Theory of Ideas in the Philosophy of Hume and Reid.H. A. Ratowsky - 1976 - Dissertation, City University of New York
The failure of Thomas Reid's attack on David Hume.Alistair Sinclair - 1995 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 3 (2):389 – 398.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
204 (#100,274)

6 months
11 (#339,306)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Wright
Central Michigan University

Citations of this work

Triggers of Thought: Impressions within Hume’s Theory of Mind.Anik Waldow - 2010 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 13 (1):105-121.
Why Hume's counterexample is insignificant and why it is not.Nancy Kendrick - 2009 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (5):955 – 979.
Whose failure, Reid's or Hume's?James W. F. Somerville - 1998 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 6 (2):247 – 259.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references